---
title: "Warren Buffett's Investment Oversights: An Analysis of Mistakes, Missed Opportunities, and Premature Sales"
author: "DeepValues Research"
publisher: "DeepValues Research (DeepValues / LuLu Ventures LLC)"
type: "Research article"
ticker: "INTC"
company: "Intel"
sector: "Technology"
industry: "Semiconductors"
wikidata: "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q248"
wikipedia: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel"
date: "2026-02-19"
language: "en"
section: "Company Research"
answer: "DeepValues Research published “Warren Buffett's Investment Oversights: An Analysis of Mistakes, Missed Opportunities, and Premature Sales” on Intel (INTC) on Feb 19, 2026. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of Warren Buffett's significant investment errors, categorizing them into mistakes of commission (active investments that failed), mistakes of omission (failures to invest in highly successful ventures), and premature sales (exiting investments too…"
canonical_url: "https://research.deepvalues.ai/company/intc/warren-buffetts-investment-oversights-an-analysis-of-mistakes-missed/"
markdown_url: "https://research.deepvalues.ai/company/intc/warren-buffetts-investment-oversights-an-analysis-of-mistakes-missed/index.md"
license: "CC BY 4.0"
license_url: "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
cite_as: "DeepValues Research, Warren Buffett's Investment Oversights: An Analysis of Mistakes, Missed Opportunities, and Premature Sales, https://research.deepvalues.ai/company/intc/warren-buffetts-investment-oversights-an-analysis-of-mistakes-missed/"
publisher_url: "https://deepvalues.ai"
app: "https://deepvalues.ai"
api: "https://app.deepvalues.ai/developers"
data_note: "Reports are dated snapshots. Current data via the DeepValues API: https://app.deepvalues.ai/developers"
disclaimer: "Educational research, not investment advice."
---
# Warren Buffett's Investment Oversights: An Analysis of Mistakes, Missed Opportunities, and Premature Sales
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of Warren Buffett's significant investment errors, categorizing them into mistakes of commission (active investments that failed), mistakes of omission (failures to invest in highly successful ventures), and premature sales (exiting investments too early). While renowned for his extraordinary long-term success at the helm of Berkshire Hathaway, Buffett has candidly acknowledged numerous missteps throughout his career. These errors, far from diminishing his legacy, offer invaluable lessons for investors.
Key mistakes of commission include the ill-fated acquisition of Dexter Shoe Company, which involved misjudging competitive dynamics and a costly payment in Berkshire Hathaway stock; the initial investment in Berkshire Hathaway's struggling textile operations, representing a massive opportunity cost; and misadventures in industries like energy with ConocoPhillips and retail with Tesco, often due to misreading market shifts or management issues. Investments in technology and media, such as IBM and Paramount Global, also presented significant challenges and losses.
Mistakes of omission feature prominently, with Buffett himself often citing these as his most significant. Failures to invest in burgeoning giants like Amazon and Google, despite some indicators of their potential, represent billions in foregone gains. Similarly, hesitation to act on opportunities within his acknowledged "circle of competence," such as Walmart and Fannie Mae, underscore the high cost of inaction.
Premature sales of highly successful companies, including an early exit from Disney and later from Home Depot, also resulted in substantial missed profits. More recent sales in the banking sector and the strategic trimming of the Apple stake continue to be scrutinized for their long-term implications.
Throughout these experiences, Warren Buffett has demonstrated a unique commitment to transparency, openly discussing his errors and the lessons learned. His investment philosophy has evolved significantly, shaped by these oversights, moving from a "cigar butt" approach to a focus on acquiring "wonderful companies at fair prices." The primary lessons derived from these errors emphasize the importance of rigorous due diligence, understanding sustainable competitive advantages, avoiding emotional decision-making, recognizing the profound impact of opportunity costs, and the critical value of continuous learning and intellectual honesty. This examination reveals that even the most accomplished investors are not immune to error, and their experiences provide a rich source of education for the broader investment community.
**I. Introduction: Learning from the Oracle's Oversights**
The Paradox of Buffett's Success and His Acknowledged Fallibility
Warren Buffett's name is synonymous with investment acumen, his leadership of Berkshire Hathaway having generated extraordinary wealth over decades, cementing his status as a financial legend.1 His compounded annual gain of over 19% from 1965 to 2023 far outpaced the S&P 500, a testament to a disciplined, research-driven approach.1 Yet, intertwined with this narrative of unparalleled success is Buffett's candid admission of numerous, sometimes substantial, investment mistakes.2 This openness about his fallibility is not a footnote to his career but a defining characteristic. The study of these errors is not intended to detract from his monumental achievements but rather to distill profound lessons that hold relevance for all investors. Buffett's public acknowledgment of his missteps serves as a potent form of risk management education for his shareholders and the wider investment world. His annual letters, often described as investment seminars rather than corporate reports 2, frequently dissect these failures. This practice implicitly educates on due diligence, competitive analysis, and the psychological pitfalls inherent in investing. It extends beyond mere transparency, becoming an active educational endeavor that likely tempers shareholder expectations and fosters resilience, especially during market turbulence when the understanding that even Buffett learns from setbacks can be particularly stabilizing.2
The Value of Studying Mistakes, Even Those of Investment Legends
The analysis of errors, particularly those made by seasoned experts, can often be more instructive than the study of their successes. Mistakes tend to lay bare flawed assumptions, cognitive biases, or misjudgments of risk and reward.5 Warren Buffett's willingness to meticulously dissect his own blunders offers a rare and valuable educational opportunity for the investment community.2 The very process of acknowledging and articulating these mistakes likely reinforces Buffett's own investment discipline and contributes to the continuous refinement of his analytical framework. There is evidence that this public and internal scrutiny makes him less prone to repeating the same category of error. For instance, he has stated that mistakes are "dissected, not buried" 2, and that "every mistake...has contributed to refining his investment philosophy".5 The costly Dexter Shoe acquisition, for example, led to a stated preference for using cash rather than stock in future acquisitions, demonstrating a direct application of lessons learned.5 This iterative learning process, fueled by an honest appraisal of past failures, is a critical component of his enduring success.
II\. Mistakes of Commission: When Active Bets Went Awry
Mistakes of commission occur when an active investment decision leads to unfavorable outcomes. Warren Buffett has openly discussed several such instances where his judgment or timing proved flawed, resulting in financial losses or significant underperformance for Berkshire Hathaway.
A. The Dexter Shoe Debacle: A Multi-Billion Dollar Lesson in Valuation and Payment Methods
In 1993, Berkshire Hathaway acquired Dexter Shoe Company. At first glance, Dexter appeared to embody the qualities Buffett sought: a strong brand, a loyal customer base, and a thrifty culture.2 However, the investment carried a fatal flaw. Buffett critically misjudged the durability of Dexter's competitive advantage in the face of rapidly growing, low-cost shoe manufacturing overseas, particularly from China.2 This fundamental error in assessing the sustainability of Dexter's "moat" was catastrophically compounded by the method of payment: $433 million in Berkshire Hathaway stock, rather than cash.2
Within a decade, the Dexter Shoe business was worthless.2 The true sting of the mistake, however, lay in the escalating value of the Berkshire shares used for the purchase. By 2019, that stock was valued at nearly $8 billion 2, and by February 2025, its estimated worth had soared to $17.87 billion.6 Buffett himself described the deal as his "worst deal ever" 2 and lamented giving away what amounted to 1.6% of Berkshire Hathaway "for nothing".7 In his reflections, Buffett acknowledged violating two of his core investment principles: first, never pay for an acquisition with undervalued stock (implicitly, Berkshire stock was considered a better long-term hold than Dexter), and second, always ensure that a business possesses a truly *sustainable* competitive advantage.6 He memorably stated that he had managed to turn "a good business into a bad investment - and paid for it with gold".2
The magnitude of the Dexter error, amplified by the use of appreciating Berkshire stock, underscores a crucial lesson in capital allocation: the currency used for an acquisition is as vital as the target itself. The "cost" of an acquisition made with stock is not merely its value at the time of the transaction, but its potential future value if retained. This sophisticated understanding of opportunity cost was painfully learned and subsequently influenced Berkshire's preference for cash acquisitions.5
B. The Original Sin: Berkshire Hathaway's Textile Roots and the $200 Billion Opportunity Cost
Warren Buffett's association with Berkshire Hathaway began in 1962, when he started investing in the then-struggling New England textile manufacturer.3 His initial investment thesis was not based on the long-term prospects of the textile industry but rather on a "cigar butt" strategy: he believed he could profit from the company's practice of buying back its shares as it systematically closed mills and liquidated assets.3
The critical error occurred when a perceived slight by the company's management regarding the price of a tender offer for his shares triggered an emotional response. Instead of selling, Buffett bought control of Berkshire Hathaway and then, against his better judgment, committed significant capital and nearly two decades to attempting to revive the fundamentally flawed textile business.3 This was an investment in a business with demonstrably poor underlying economics, operating in a declining industry. The textile operations continued to consume capital until they were finally shuttered in 1985.7
The financial impact of this decision was not a direct loss in the conventional sense but a colossal opportunity cost. Buffett himself estimated that his attempts to salvage the textile business cost Berkshire Hathaway approximately $200 billion in foregone gains over the subsequent decades.3 This figure represents the astronomical growth that the capital tied up in the textile mills could have achieved had it been deployed earlier into businesses with favorable economics, such as the insurance operations that later became the bedrock of Berkshire's success.
Reflecting on this period, Buffett has referred to the investment in the textile business as his "worst investment" 7 and a significant "mistake of commission".3 This painful experience was instrumental in shaping one of his most famous aphorisms: "When a manager with a reputation for brilliance meets up with a business with a reputation for bad economics, it's the business's reputation that remains intact".3 It marked a pivotal evolution in his investment philosophy, steering him away from merely cheap businesses towards "finding wonderful businesses at fair prices".3 The irony remains that the corporate shell of this initial mistake became the vehicle for one of history's greatest investment successes.
C. Misjudging Industry Dynamics and Risks
Several of Buffett's notable errors stemmed from misinterpretations of industry-specific risks, competitive landscapes, or the sustainability of business models.
1\. General Re: The Perils of Derivatives and Misplaced Trust
In 1998, Berkshire Hathaway acquired General Re, a major reinsurance company, for $22 billion. This acquisition proceeded despite explicit misgivings expressed by Buffett's long-time partner, Charlie Munger, particularly concerning Gen Re's substantial exposure to complex derivatives.2 Buffett's initial plan was to wind down this risky derivatives unit post-acquisition, a plan that was not executed as intended.2 The consequences were severe: General Re was found to have systematically underpriced its insurance policies and under-reserved for potential risks.2 This led to a cascade of problems, culminating in $6.1 billion in underwriting losses for Berkshire Hathaway between 1999 and 2001.2 Buffett later characterized the Gen Re saga as a "cautionary tale in misplaced trust," emphasizing that even strong personal and professional relationships necessitate rigorous, independent due diligence.2
2\. ConocoPhillips: A Costly Foray into Commodity Volatility
Berkshire Hathaway significantly increased its investment in ConocoPhillips in 2008, a period when oil and gas prices were approaching their cyclical peak.8 The core error was a misjudgment of near-term energy price movements; Buffett himself admitted he "in no way anticipated the dramatic fall in energy prices that occurred in the last half of the year".8 As global energy markets cratered in late 2008 amidst the financial crisis, so did ConocoPhillips' stock value. Berkshire Hathaway consequently absorbed a $1.5 billion loss in the first quarter of 2009, predominantly fueled by a $1.9 billion write-down of its ConocoPhillips investment. Buffett stated that the "terrible timing" of his purchase had cost Berkshire "several billion dollars".8 The company began reducing its stake shortly after the losses materialized and fully exited the position by 2013.8 Buffett was characteristically forthright about this "major mistake of commission," attributing it to poor timing, even while maintaining a longer-term belief in higher oil prices.8
3\. Tesco: Navigating International Waters and Accounting Red Flags
Buffett initiated an investment in Tesco, a leading UK supermarket chain, in 2006, eventually building Berkshire's holding to over 4% of the company by 2014, making it one of Tesco's largest shareholders.10 The investment soured due to a combination of factors. Tesco's market position weakened considerably under pressure from discount retailers like Aldi and Lidl, which eroded its pricing power.5 More critically, in 2014, Tesco became embroiled in an accounting scandal, admitting that its profits had been overstated.10 Buffett's error here was twofold: underestimating the competitive threat and, crucially, "dawdling" when red flags appeared. He sold Berkshire's stake at a substantial loss, estimated to be around $444 million 12, though some reports indicated a charge of $678 million related to the holding in one year.13 Buffett reflected on this experience, stating, "An attentive investor, I'm embarrassed to report, would have sold Tesco shares earlier. I made a big mistake with this investment by dawdling".10 This episode reinforced his caution regarding management credibility and the adage that "there is rarely only one cockroach in a kitchen" when accounting issues surface.5
4\. The Airline Industry (Historical): A Historically Turbulent Sector
Buffett's experiences with the airline industry have been historically challenging. While specific details of his more recent large-scale investment and subsequent sale of major U.S. airline stocks in 2020 during the pandemic are not extensively covered in the provided materials, his long-standing skepticism about the industry is well-documented.5 Airlines are characterized by high fixed costs, significant capital expenditure requirements, and thin, volatile profit margins, making them acutely vulnerable to economic downturns and external shocks.5 His earlier, troubled investment in US Airways preferred stock in 1989, though eventually profitable, was one he termed a mistake. These experiences led Buffett to reaffirm his general aversion to capital-intensive industries with poor long-term economics 5, famously quipping that if a capitalist had been present at Kitty Hawk, they should have shot Orville Wright to save future investors from losses.
A common thread across several of these commission errors, including Dexter Shoe, the original Berkshire textile operations, IBM, and Kraft Heinz, is an underestimation of disruptive forces. These forces ranged from globalization and its impact on domestic manufacturing (Dexter), to fundamental shifts in industry economics (textiles), rapid technological evolution (IBM), and changing consumer preferences coupled with the impact of aggressive financial engineering (Kraft Heinz). This pattern suggests that even a keen focus on identifying "durable competitive advantages" can be insufficient if the dynamism of macroeconomic trends or secular industry shifts is not continuously and rigorously re-evaluated. The concept of "durable" itself appears to be contracting in lifespan across many sectors, demanding a more agile assessment of competitive moats. Furthermore, certain large-scale investments like General Re, ConocoPhillips, and Paramount Global involved substantial capital deployment, sometimes made relatively quickly or with overriding concerns (as with Munger's warnings on General Re). This may indicate that the sheer scale of Berkshire Hathaway and the consequent need to deploy vast sums of capital-the "elephant gun" problem-can, at times, lead to decisions that are less than optimal or involve a greater willingness to overlook certain risks, especially if the pressure to invest is high.
D. Challenges in Technology and Media Investments
Buffett's traditional focus on businesses with long operating histories and predictable earnings streams initially made him cautious of the rapidly evolving technology sector. When he did venture in, the results were mixed.
1\. IBM: A Bet on Legacy Tech That Stumbled
In a significant move for Berkshire Hathaway, Buffett began investing heavily in International Business Machines (IBM) in November 2011, ultimately acquiring 64 million shares for a total of $10.7 billion, at an average price of $170 per share.9 This was widely interpreted as Buffett finally embracing the technology sector, albeit through a well-established, "legacy" player.9 The investment thesis, however, did not unfold as anticipated. Buffett and his team seemingly misjudged IBM's capacity to navigate the profound shifts occurring in the tech landscape, particularly the transition to cloud computing and its ability to maintain a competitive edge against more agile and innovative rivals. IBM experienced several years of declining sales and stagnating performance during Berkshire's holding period.9 By 2018, Berkshire had divested its entire IBM stake, incurring a loss of nearly 20% as the stock price had fallen to approximately $140 per share.9 While Buffett did not offer extensive public commentary on specific lessons learned beyond the financial outcome, his subsequent, and far more successful, large-scale investment in Apple suggests a refined understanding of the technology sector. The IBM experience likely underscored the risks of investing in "value traps"-companies that appear cheap but are in secular decline-especially within rapidly changing industries. It may have also highlighted the importance of identifying tech companies with strong consumer franchises and robust ecosystem moats, characteristics more evident in Apple than in IBM at the time.1
2\. Paramount Global: Underestimating Media's Transformation
More recently, Berkshire Hathaway built a significant position in Paramount Global, accumulating 93.6 million shares, valued at approximately $1.6 billion, by the first quarter of 2022.8 This investment represented a bet on a portfolio of well-known media assets. However, the decision appeared to underestimate the profound structural challenges confronting traditional media companies. These included the persistent decline of linear cable television subscriptions, an increasingly difficult advertising market, and intense, capital-draining competition in the direct-to-consumer streaming space.8 Paramount's financial performance deteriorated, marked by a $6 billion write-down of its cable businesses in August 2024.8 Berkshire began selling its stake in 2023 and announced a complete exit by May 2024, a period during which Paramount's shares had lost more than two-thirds of their value from when Berkshire initiated the position.8 At Berkshire's annual meeting, Buffett took full personal responsibility for the investment, stating, "I was 100% responsible for the Paramount decision...we lost quite a bit of money".8
E. The Price of Familiarity: The Kraft Heinz Overpayment
Berkshire Hathaway played a pivotal role in the 2015 merger of Kraft Foods and H.J. Heinz, partnering with 3G Capital. Berkshire held a substantial stake in the newly formed Kraft Heinz Company (KHC), owning 325 million shares, or 26.8% of the company, with an initial cost basis around $9.8 billion.15 The core mistake in this investment was overpaying for the combined entity.15 This overpayment occurred alongside an underestimation of the significant headwinds facing established packaged food brands, such as weakening brand loyalty, shifts in consumer preferences towards fresher and healthier options, and the rise of private-label competitors. Furthermore, the aggressive cost-cutting measures implemented by 3G Capital, while initially boosting margins, were criticized for potentially harming long-term brand equity and innovation.15
The financial consequences were stark. Kraft Heinz was forced to take massive write-downs on the value of some of its iconic brands, including a $15.4 billion impairment in February 2019, followed by another $1.2 billion charge in August 2019.16 While Berkshire's investment, including dividends received, remained profitable for a period 16, the opportunity cost was substantial, and the stock significantly underperformed the broader market. Buffett explicitly admitted that he had "overpaid for Kraft" \[15 (implied via write-down discussion)\]. This experience serves as a critical reminder that even powerful, well-known brands can become poor investments if the acquisition price is too high or if post-acquisition strategies prioritize short-term financial engineering over long-term brand stewardship and adaptation to evolving market realities.
**Table 1: Summary of Major Mistakes of Commission**
| **Investment** | **Period of Investment/Error** | **Nature of Mistake** | **Reported Financial Impact (e.g., loss, write-down, opportunity cost of stock used)** | **Key Lesson Highlighted by Buffett/Learned** |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dexter Shoe Company | Acquired 1993 | Misjudged competitive advantage; paid with over $400M in BRK stock. 2 | Business became worthless; BRK stock used would be worth \~$8B-$17.87B later. 2 | Don't pay with undervalued stock for a declining business; ensure *sustainable* competitive advantage. 5 |
| Berkshire Hathaway (Textile Mills) | 1962 - \~1985 | Emotional decision to buy control; trying to save a failing business in a declining industry. 3 | Estimated $200 billion in opportunity cost. 3 | Brilliant managers can't save businesses with bad economics; shift to quality businesses. 3 |
| General Re | Acquired 1998 | Underestimated derivatives risk; failed to wind down risky unit; misplaced trust. 2 | $6.1 billion in underwriting losses (1999-2001). 2 | Even close relationships require hard diligence; be wary of complex financial instruments. 2 |
| ConocoPhillips | 2008 (major purchase) - 2013 (exit) | Bad timing; bought near peak oil/gas prices; didn't anticipate price collapse. 8 | \~$1.5B Q1 2009 loss for BRK; "several billion dollars" cost due to timing. 8 | Acknowledge timing mistakes even with long-term conviction. 8 |
| Tesco | 2006 - 2014 | "Dawdling" on sale despite weakening fundamentals, competition, and accounting scandal. 10 | Sold at a loss of \~$444M - $678M. 12 | Act decisively on red flags; "rarely only one cockroach"; increased caution on management credibility. 5 |
| IBM | 2011 - 2018 | Misjudged ability to adapt to tech shifts (e.g., cloud); legacy tech "value trap." 9 | Nearly 20% loss on $10.7B investment. 9 | Importance of understanding evolving competitive dynamics in tech; pivot to stronger tech franchises (e.g., Apple). 9 |
| Paramount Global | 2022 - 2024 | Underestimated challenges in traditional media (cord-cutting, streaming wars, ad market). 8 | "Lost quite a bit of money"; stock lost >2/3rds of value during holding. 8 | Took full responsibility for the misjudgment. 8 |
| Kraft Heinz | 2015 (merger) - Ongoing | Overpaid for the combined entity; underestimated brand challenges and impact of 3G's cost-cutting. 15 | Massive brand write-downs by KHC; BRK's investment underperformed significantly. 15 | Even strong brands can be a bad investment if overpaid for or poorly managed post-acquisition. 15 |
III\. Mistakes of Omission: The Opportunities Left Untouched
Warren Buffett has repeatedly stated that his most significant errors are not the investments that went sour, but rather the golden opportunities he failed to seize-the mistakes of omission.2 These are instances where he understood a business or an investment thesis but, for various reasons, did not act, thereby forgoing substantial potential gains for Berkshire Hathaway.
A. The Giants He Watched Pass By:
The technology sector, in particular, presented several colossal opportunities that Buffett and Berkshire largely missed during their most explosive growth phases.
1\. Amazon: "Too Hard" or a Missed Evolution?
Warren Buffett has expressed admiration for Amazon's founder, Jeff Bezos, on multiple occasions, acknowledging meeting him early in Amazon's journey and recognizing his special qualities.19 Despite this, Buffett did not invest in Amazon during its formative years or its subsequent meteoric rise. His primary stated reason was that Amazon's business model and its potential to expand far beyond online book sales into a global e-commerce and cloud computing behemoth were outside his "circle of competence".19 He admitted, "I didn't realize you could go from books to what's happened there".19 While Buffett maintains that he doesn't typically regret missing opportunities that he feels he doesn't understand, the sheer scale of Amazon's success has led to acknowledgments that this was a multi-billion dollar missed chance for Berkshire.2 The "circle of competence" argument, while a cornerstone of his philosophy, might in this case also reflect a degree of cognitive inertia or an underestimation of his own capacity to learn and adapt to new, transformative business models, especially when the founder's exceptional talent was recognized.
2\. Google: The Obvious Clue from GEICO
The case of missing Google (now Alphabet) is perhaps even more pointed. Both Buffett and his partner Charlie Munger have admitted that they regularly used Google's search engine for their investment research and clearly saw its market dominance unfolding.18 More significantly, GEICO, a wholly-owned Berkshire Hathaway subsidiary, was a substantial advertising client of Google, providing direct insight into the power and profitability of Google's advertising business model.17 Despite these clear indicators, and Buffett's later admission that he could have understood Google's business because of GEICO's involvement, they failed to invest.23 Munger famously quipped, "We just sat there sucking our thumbs. We could see it. We just didn't act" 18, and later, "I feel like a horse's ass for not identifying Google".23 Buffett concurred, stating, "We blew it".23 The estimated financial impact of this omission is staggering; a hypothetical $1 billion investment in Google in 2004 could have appreciated to $30-40 billion within two decades.18 This miss, particularly given the internal data points available via GEICO, suggests that the "circle of competence" is not merely about existing knowledge but also about the proactive willingness to connect dots and expand that circle when compelling evidence presents itself.
B. Hesitation Within the Circle:
Perhaps more vexing for Buffett than missing companies he felt he didn't understand are the instances where he identified a promising investment well within his circle of competence but failed to act decisively.
1\. Walmart: The High Cost of "Thumb-Sucking"
Buffett has disclosed that he considered making a very large investment in Walmart shares, an opportunity that was clearly within his understanding of retail and business moats.2 He had a plan to buy 100 million shares but ultimately "failed to follow through," an inaction he attributed to "sucking his thumb" - essentially, indecision.4 Another source suggests this hesitation was due to "price attachment," a reluctance to pay the prevailing market price despite recognizing the company's quality.24 The consequence of this inaction was missing out on gains that would have amounted to nearly $10 billion based on some estimates 4, with one source suggesting a much higher, perhaps less conservative, figure of $100 billion.22 Buffett consistently refers to such omissions, where understanding was present but action was lacking, as his "biggest mistakes".2
2\. Fannie Mae: A Regretted Inaction
Another significant omission acknowledged by Buffett was the failure to invest in Fannie Mae during a period when the company was facing difficulties and its stock was available "for practically nothing".3 This was an investment that Buffett confirmed was within his "circle of competence"; he understood the business and its potential.17 He recounted that he had made a decision to buy but then "just didn't execute" that decision.17 This instance of "thumb-sucking," or being paralyzed by indecision, cost Berkshire Hathaway dearly. Buffett estimated that this particular omission resulted in foregone profits of at least $5 billion 3, with other accounts suggesting "many billions".17 This miss powerfully underscores his assertion: "The biggest mistakes we've made by far... are mistakes of omission and not commission".3
The "thumb-sucking" on opportunities like Walmart and Fannie Mae, which were clearly understood, indicates that even for a remarkably decisive investor like Buffett, psychological barriers can impede action. Fear of overpaying, as suggested with Walmart 24, or perhaps broader market anxieties, can lead to costly inaction. This highlights that overcoming emotional hurdles and the inertia of indecision is as critical to investment success as analytical prowess. The sheer scale of the estimated financial impact from these omissions-tens of billions from Google and Amazon, and many billions from Walmart and Fannie Mae-often dwarfs the losses incurred from most mistakes of commission (with the notable exception of the opportunity cost embedded in the Dexter Shoe stock deal). This mathematically substantiates Buffett's claim that omissions represent his most significant errors and underscores the immense cost of not participating in the long-term compounding of truly great businesses, especially for an investor with the capital scale of Berkshire Hathaway.
**Table 2: Overview of Significant Missed Opportunities (Omissions)**
| **Company** | **Period of Missed Opportunity** | **Stated Reason for Omission** | **Estimated Scale of Missed Gain (if available)** | **Buffett's/Munger's Reflection** |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Amazon | Early growth years | Outside "circle of competence"; didn't foresee scale beyond books. 19 | "Billions" or "tens of billions." 7 | Admires Bezos; doesn't regret missing things outside his circle, but acknowledges the miss. 19 |
| Google (Alphabet) | Early 2000s (e.g., 2004) | Avoided tech, though admitted could have understood via GEICO. "Sucking our thumbs." 18 | $1B in 2004 could be $30-40B later. "Multi-billion dollar mistake." 18 | Munger: "horse's ass"; Buffett: "We blew it." 23 |
| Walmart | Unspecified early period | "Thumb-sucking"; failed to follow through on plan to buy 100M shares; price attachment. 4 | Nearly $10 billion (or more, up to $100B by one account). 4 | Omissions are his "biggest mistakes." 2 |
| Fannie Mae | Period of trouble, "for practically nothing" | Understood business, decided to buy but "didn't execute." 3 | At least $5 billion or "many billions." 3 | "Biggest mistakes... are mistakes of omission." 3 |
IV\. Wrong Sellings: The Perils of Exiting Prematurely
Beyond making ill-fated investments or missing out on great ones, another category of error in investing is selling a successful holding too early, thereby forgoing significant future appreciation. Warren Buffett, despite his advocacy for long-term holding periods, has also acknowledged instances where Berkshire Hathaway exited positions prematurely.
**A. Letting True Winners Go: The Stories of Disney and Home Depot**
1\. Disney:
Berkshire Hathaway's initial foray into The Walt Disney Company occurred in 1966, with an investment of $4 million for what amounted to a 5% stake in the company.25 Just a year later, in 1967, Buffett sold this entire stake for $6 million, realizing a quick 50% profit.9 While profitable in the short term, this sale proved to be a monumental error in long-term wealth creation. Disney went on to experience decades of exponential growth, driven by its unparalleled brand strength, intellectual property, and expansion into theme parks, media networks, and global entertainment. Buffett later estimated that if Berkshire had held onto that initial 5% stake, it would have been worth approximately $20 billion by 2024 25, representing an opportunity cost of around $19 billion. He has referred to this early sale as a "huge mistake" 25 and, in terms of opportunity cost, perhaps his "biggest mistake".25 His reflections indicate a lament for not fully appreciating the enduring and recyclable nature of Disney's iconic characters and the long-term economic power of its unique business model.25 The Disney premature sale, a company whose business model featuring recyclable intellectual property and strong brand loyalty aligns perfectly with Buffett's later articulated "wonderful company" investment criteria, suggests that even when the core tenets of a great business are discernible, the allure of short-term profit-taking or a temporary lack of conviction in its massive long-term scaling potential can override a more patient, long-term holding discipline.
2\. Home Depot:
Berkshire Hathaway also had a significant holding in Home Depot, amounting to 3.7 million shares. However, Buffett began to sell this position in the second quarter of 2009 and had completely exited the investment by the third quarter of 2010.26 The rationale for this sale appears to have been a pessimistic outlook on the U.S. housing market at the time; Buffett seemingly believed conditions would deteriorate further before any recovery took hold.26 This judgment proved to be ill-timed. Home Depot's stock subsequently performed very strongly as the housing market and the broader economy recovered. By July 2017, it was estimated that Berkshire had missed out on approximately $450 million in potential capital gains and an additional $47 million in dividends from its Home Depot shares, totaling a forgone sum of roughly $500 million.26 While Buffett hasn't been as vocal about this specific sale as with Disney, it serves as an example of how a short-term market view can lead to the premature sale of a quality business.
B. Untimely Exits from the Financial Sector: Wells Fargo, JPMorgan, and Citigroup
Warren Buffett has historically been a significant investor in bank stocks, often praising their fundamental business models when well-managed.4 However, several sales in this sector around the time of the COVID-19 pandemic and more recently have, in hindsight, appeared premature.
Berkshire began reducing its substantial stake in **Wells Fargo** starting in 2019 and fully exited the position in the first quarter of 2022.28 The primary driver for these sales was Buffett's increasing frustration with the bank following a series of damaging scandals, including the phony accounts issue.4 Many shares were reportedly sold around $30.4 Similarly, Berkshire sold off its stake in **JPMorgan Chase** at prices below $100 per share "not long before the COVID pandemic" 4, as part of a broader cooling towards the banking sector at that time. Both Wells Fargo and JPMorgan stocks have more than doubled in value since Berkshire's sales.4
More recently, Berkshire Hathaway acquired a significant stake in **Citigroup** in the first quarter of 2022, at an average cost of about $53.40 per share. In a move that surprised some observers, Berkshire then dumped 73% of this holding in the fourth quarter of 2024, when Citigroup's average stock price was around $67.32.27 This sale yielded a respectable gain of approximately 27% (an annualized return of about 9.8%). However, the rationale appeared to be driven by a broader market view that stocks were overvalued in 2024, leading Berkshire to hoard cash in anticipation of a potential correction.27 Analysts have argued that this sale of Citigroup might have been premature, given the bank's ongoing transformation efforts under its new CEO and its persistent undervaluation relative to peers.27 These sales in the banking sector appear to reflect a degree of market timing or macroeconomic forecasting. This practice is somewhat at odds with Buffett's general advice to most investors to focus on individual business fundamentals rather than trying to predict market movements.24 It suggests a potential tension between his preached philosophy for others and the practical necessities or strategic choices made when managing a portfolio of Berkshire's colossal size, sometimes leading to timing that is suboptimal from a purely stock-specific, long-term perspective.
C. Trimming the Apple Stake: Strategic Rebalancing or a Future Regret?
Apple Inc. grew to become Berkshire Hathaway's largest single stock holding, a testament to a highly successful investment made relatively late in Buffett's career. However, Buffett has made substantial sales of Apple stock, including a notable reduction of 390 million shares.17 This significantly reduced Berkshire's economic share in Apple, roughly halving it at one point.17 The reasons provided for these sales have varied, including prudent portfolio rebalancing to reduce concentration risk, concerns about potential future increases in capital gains tax rates, and the identification of other opportunities, such as repurchasing Berkshire Hathaway's own stock, which Buffett might have deemed a better investment at the time.17 There's also speculation that he might not fully grasp or be convinced by the potential future impact of Apple's newer ventures, such as Apple Intelligence (AI).17
The potential consequence of these sales is that Berkshire could miss out on substantial future economic gains if Apple continues its strong growth trajectory, potentially fueled by these new initiatives. This could, in time, be viewed as another instance of selling a winner too early.17 Buffett himself has acknowledged the tax concerns. Generally, he does not categorize the strategic trimming of a highly successful and well-understood business in the same way he views the complete omission of a great investment.17 Nevertheless, the decision to reduce a holding in such a dominant and profitable company always carries the risk of future regret. The rationale for trimming Apple is logical from a conventional portfolio management standpoint. However, it also introduces the possibility of a significant foregone gain if Apple's next phase of growth, perhaps driven by artificial intelligence or other innovations, substantially outpaces the returns Berkshire achieves with the redeployed capital. This situation is less of an outright "mistake" in the present and more a strategic decision that carries the potential for future re-evaluation, much like the Disney sale is viewed in hindsight.
**Table 3: Analysis of Notable Premature Sales**
| **Company** | **Period Sold** | **Stated/Inferred Reason for Sale** | **Subsequent Performance & Estimated Forgone Gains** |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| The Walt Disney Company | 1967 (initial stake) | Quick 50% profit-taking. 9 | Stock experienced exponential growth; initial $4M stake could be worth \~$20B by 2024 (Opportunity cost \~$19B). 25 |
| Home Depot | Q2 2009 - Q3 2010 | Belief housing market would worsen before improving. 26 | Stock performed strongly; missed \~$450M in gains and $47M in dividends by July 2017. 26 |
| Wells Fargo | 2019 - Q1 2022 | Repeated scandals and frustration with management. 4 | Stock more than doubled since many sales. 4 |
| JPMorgan Chase | "Not long before COVID pandemic" | General souring on bank stocks pre-pandemic. 4 | Stock more than doubled since sales. 4 |
| Citigroup | Q4 2024 (73% of stake) | Market viewed as overvalued; hoarding cash; short-term gain. 27 | Analysts suggest sale might be premature given company transformation and undervaluation. 27 |
| Apple Inc. (partial sales) | Various tranches, e.g., $90B sale mentioned 17 | Portfolio rebalancing; tax concerns; better opportunities (BRK repurchase). 17 | Potential to miss future gains if Apple's growth continues strongly (e.g., AI). Observation for future. 17 |
V. The Buffett Doctrine on Errors: Transparency, Evolution, and Enduring Principles
Warren Buffett's approach to his investment mistakes is as instructive as the mistakes themselves. His philosophy is characterized by remarkable candor, a commitment to learning and evolution, and an adherence to core principles that have been refined over decades of experience.
A. The Power of Candor: Buffett's Approach to Disclosing Mistakes
A distinguishing feature of Warren Buffett's career is his extraordinary willingness to openly and publicly discuss his investment errors. This is most evident in his annual letters to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders, which are renowned for their clarity, wit, and educational value, often reading more like investment seminars than standard corporate reports.2 In these letters, failures are aired as freely as triumphs.2 This radical transparency serves multiple purposes. Firstly, it builds and maintains a deep level of trust with shareholders, treating them as partners in the enterprise rather than mere recipients of financial data.2 Secondly, it sets a high standard for corporate accountability and governance. Buffett's frequent use of terms like "mistake" and "error" in his communications stands in stark contrast to the often euphemistic language employed by many other corporate leaders.3 This practice is not merely a personal quirk but a fundamental component of Berkshire Hathaway's corporate culture and, arguably, a competitive advantage. It fosters a learning organization and attracts a base of long-term, informed shareholders who understand that mistakes are an inherent part of the investment process. This stable shareholder base, in turn, provides Buffett with the latitude to make long-term decisions without succumbing to excessive short-term market pressures.
B. From "Cigar Butts" to "Wonderful Companies": How Mistakes Shaped His Philosophy
Buffett's investment philosophy has not been static; it has undergone significant evolution, heavily influenced by the lessons learned from his early mistakes. Initially, under the strong influence of his mentor Benjamin Graham, Buffett practiced a "cigar butt" style of investing-seeking out deeply undervalued companies that had perhaps one last "puff" of value left in them, regardless of their underlying quality.2 His experiences with the failing Berkshire Hathaway textile mills 2 and the ill-fated Dexter Shoe acquisition 2 were painful but powerful catalysts for change. These errors taught him the limitations of buying businesses with poor economics, even at seemingly bargain prices. He learned to prize business quality over mere statistical cheapness, a shift encapsulated in his famous statement: "It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price".1 This evolution also reflects the increasing influence of Charlie Munger, who consistently emphasized the importance of investing in high-quality businesses with durable competitive advantages or "moats".1 This strategic pivot from "cigar butts" to "wonderful companies" is a profound one, reflecting an understanding that true, sustainable long-term compounding is primarily driven by business quality and growth, not just by exploiting temporary market mispricings. This is a crucial lesson that many value investors continue to grapple with, demonstrating Buffett's intellectual flexibility and his capacity to learn from costly experiences, fundamentally reshaping his approach to capital allocation towards the long-term ownership of superior enterprises.
C. The "Circle of Competence" and the Gravity of Omissions
A central tenet of Buffett's refined investment philosophy is the concept of the "circle of competence".5 He advocates investing only in businesses that one thoroughly understands, including their economics, competitive dynamics, and potential risks. He has acknowledged that many of his mistakes of commission occurred when he ventured outside this circle, or when his assessment of a company's position within it proved flawed.5 However, Buffett consistently maintains that his most significant and costly errors have been mistakes of omission-failing to act on compelling investment opportunities that were, in fact, within his circle of competence.2 He has stated that he has "missed profits of as much as... $10 billion" on opportunities he knew enough to pursue but didn't.18 This profound emphasis on sins of omission over sins of commission reflects a sophisticated understanding of opportunity cost, particularly at the scale at which Berkshire Hathaway operates. For an entity with enormous and continuously growing capital to deploy, missing out on a multi-decade compounder-a truly great business-represents a far greater impediment to long-term wealth creation than incurring a manageable loss on an individual active investment. This perspective shifts the conventional risk calculus from an overwhelming "fear of losing X amount" to an equally potent "fear of missing out on 10X or 100X potential." It encourages a mindset geared towards identifying and, crucially, seizing those rare, large-scale opportunities that can make a transformative difference to a portfolio over time. His philosophy also encompasses a broader list of general investment mistakes to avoid, such as attempting to time the market, becoming emotionally attached to purchase prices, relying on aggressive and unsustainable growth projections, and using excessive leverage.24
**VI. Conclusion: Actionable Insights from Buffett's Investment Journey**
Synthesizing the Key Takeaways for Contemporary Investors
The examination of Warren Buffett's investment mistakes, missed opportunities, and premature sales offers a rich tapestry of lessons for contemporary investors. Perhaps the most overarching takeaway is the imperative of humility; even the most celebrated investor is fallible. This acknowledgment paves the way for continuous learning, a hallmark of Buffett's career. His errors underscore the critical need for rigorous due diligence 5, not just in assessing financial statements but in deeply understanding a company's sustainable competitive advantages and the potential threats to them.5 The costly consequences of decisions like the initial Berkshire Hathaway textile investment or the Dexter Shoe acquisition highlight the dangers of emotional decision-making and the importance of rationality.3
Buffett's reflections on his omissions drive home the **true cost of opportunity** 3; failing to act on a well-understood, high-quality prospect can be far more detrimental than a mistake of commission. This ties into the value of a **long-term perspective** 14 and **patience** 5, as premature sales of companies like Disney demonstrate the wealth foregone by prioritizing short-term gains over long-term compounding. Furthermore, investors should be wary of the "institutional imperative"-the tendency to follow the crowd or engage in activity for its own sake 2-and actively combat **confirmation bias** by seeking out disconfirming evidence.24 The wisdom in **admitting and meticulously analyzing mistakes** is a recurring theme, not as an act of self-flagellation, but as a vital mechanism for refining one's investment process and avoiding repeat errors.
The Enduring Relevance of Learning from Both Successes and Failures
Warren Buffett's investment journey, with its spectacular successes and instructive failures, provides enduring lessons that remain profoundly relevant in today's dynamic and often unpredictable markets. His career demonstrates that embracing one's own fallibility and fostering an unwavering commitment to learning are as crucial to long-term investment success as any specific analytical skill or predictive capability.5
Ultimately, the study of Buffett's mistakes does not detract from his legendary status; rather, it reinforces the core tenets that underpin his enduring success. These include the remarkable power of his learning ability, his adaptability in the face of changing market conditions and lessons learned, and his fundamental focus on intrinsic value. The mistakes, in many ways, are the exceptions that prove the rule of his generally sound, long-term, value-oriented approach. His capacity to self-correct, learn from an error, and then integrate that lesson into his evolving framework is perhaps one of his most significant, yet least imitable, strengths.
For individual investors, the most actionable insight derived from Buffett's errors may not be to try and perfectly emulate his stock picks or to simply avoid the specific blunders he made. Instead, it is the imperative to develop a clear, well-reasoned investment philosophy tailored to one's own circumstances and temperament, and, critically, to establish a robust process for reviewing all investment decisions-both good and bad. The *process* of learning, self-critique, and continuous improvement, so vividly demonstrated by Buffett, is more transferable and ultimately more valuable than the specific outcomes of any single investment decision. By cultivating such a process, investors can navigate the complexities of the market with greater skill and resilience, turning their own inevitable mistakes into stepping stones for future success.
#### Works cited
1. As Warren Buffett '51 Steps Down, Investing Legends Share Their Reflections, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://business.columbia.edu/insights/finance-economics/warren-buffett-steps-down-investing-legend-reflections](https://business.columbia.edu/insights/finance-economics/warren-buffett-steps-down-investing-legend-reflections)
2. How Warren Buffett's biggest investing mistakes actually teach you smart money lessons, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20250514202/how-warren-buffetts-biggest-investing-mistakes-actually-teach-you-smart-money-lessons](https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20250514202/how-warren-buffetts-biggest-investing-mistakes-actually-teach-you-smart-money-lessons)
3. Warren Buffett's Single Biggest Mistake In His Investing Career ..., accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.newtraderu.com/2025/04/25/warren-buffetts-single-biggest-mistake-in-his-investing-career/](https://www.newtraderu.com/2025/04/25/warren-buffetts-single-biggest-mistake-in-his-investing-career/)
4. Some of Warren Buffett's best and worst investments in his 60 years ..., accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/some-of-warren-buffetts-best-and-worst-investments-in-his-60-years-at-berkshire-hathaway](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/some-of-warren-buffetts-best-and-worst-investments-in-his-60-years-at-berkshire-hathaway)
5. Warren Buffett's biggest investment mistakes: Lessons learned from failures \| Trustnet, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.trustnet.com/investing/13445208/warren-buffetts-biggest-investment-mistakes-lessons-learned-from-failures](https://www.trustnet.com/investing/13445208/warren-buffetts-biggest-investment-mistakes-lessons-learned-from-failures)
6. Warren Buffett's Worst Deal Ever Cost $17.87B-Here's What You ..., accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.investopedia.com/warren-buffett-s-worst-deal-ever-8788510](https://www.investopedia.com/warren-buffett-s-worst-deal-ever-8788510)
7. From Apple to Dexter Shoes: Warren Buffett's top wins and biggest ..., accessed May 17, 2025, [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/from-apple-to-dexter-shoes-warren-buffetts-top-wins-and-biggest-blunders-in-60-years-of-investing/articleshow/120864756.cms](https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/from-apple-to-dexter-shoes-warren-buffetts-top-wins-and-biggest-blunders-in-60-years-of-investing/articleshow/120864756.cms)
8. 7 of Warren Buffett's Biggest Misses \| Kiplinger, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.kiplinger.com/investing/warren-buffetts-biggest-misses](https://www.kiplinger.com/investing/warren-buffetts-biggest-misses)
9. Warren Buffet's Blunders: 3 Investments Even the Oracle Regrets ..., accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/warren-buffets-blunders:-3-investments-even-the-oracle-regrets](https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/warren-buffets-blunders:-3-investments-even-the-oracle-regrets)
10. If I'd bought Tesco shares when Warren Buffett was selling, here's ..., accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.fool.co.uk/2024/09/24/if-id-bought-tesco-shares-when-warren-buffett-was-selling-heres-what-id-have-now/](https://www.fool.co.uk/2024/09/24/if-id-bought-tesco-shares-when-warren-buffett-was-selling-heres-what-id-have-now/)
11. Did Warren Buffett Make a Mistake Selling Rallying Tesco? - Nasdaq, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/did-warren-buffett-make-mistake-selling-rallying-tesco-2016-03-09](https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/did-warren-buffett-make-mistake-selling-rallying-tesco-2016-03-09)
12. Warren Buffett's biggest investment mistakes: Lessons learned from failures \| Trustnet, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.trustnet.com/investing/13445208/fund/fund/sectors](https://www.trustnet.com/investing/13445208/fund/fund/sectors)
13. Warren Buffett dumped Tesco before record loss, accessed May 17, 2025, [http://money.cnn.com/2015/04/22/investing/tesco-earnings-loss-buffett/index.html](http://money.cnn.com/2015/04/22/investing/tesco-earnings-loss-buffett/index.html)
14. Warren Buffett's Biggest Investment Hits and Misses, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://pictureperfectportfolios.com/warren-buffetts-biggest-investment-hits-and-misses/](https://pictureperfectportfolios.com/warren-buffetts-biggest-investment-hits-and-misses/)
15. Learn From Warren Buffett's Mistake. Buy This High-Yield Stock ..., accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.mitrade.com/insights/news/live-news/article-8-813210-20250511](https://www.mitrade.com/insights/news/live-news/article-8-813210-20250511)
16. Here's How Much Warren Buffett Has Made on Kraft Heinz \| The Motley Fool, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.fool.com/investing/2019/11/24/heres-how-much-warren-buffett-has-lost-on-kraft-he.aspx](https://www.fool.com/investing/2019/11/24/heres-how-much-warren-buffett-has-lost-on-kraft-he.aspx)
17. Buffett's Biggest Mistake - Financhill, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://financhill.com/blog/investing/buffetts-biggest-mistake](https://financhill.com/blog/investing/buffetts-biggest-mistake)
18. Buffett Ignored Google & Lost $30 Billion - Don't Miss The Same Mistake Again In 2025 , Buy This - YouTube, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.youtube.com/shorts/sM51kKCAdwE](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/sM51kKCAdwE)
19. Lessons from Warren Buffett: Missing Amazon and Microsoft \| The ..., accessed May 17, 2025, [https://acquirersmultiple.com/2025/01/lessons-from-warren-buffett-missing-amazon-and-microsoft/](https://acquirersmultiple.com/2025/01/lessons-from-warren-buffett-missing-amazon-and-microsoft/)
20. Warren Buffett on why he didn't buy Amazon initially and why it wasn't a mistake - YouTube, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kkWMSJwCyUc&pp=ygUOI3R3YXJyZW5idWZmZXQ%3D](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kkWMSJwCyUc&pp=ygUOI3R3YXJyZW5idWZmZXQ%3D)
21. Warren Buffett's best and worst investments \| News, Sports, Jobs - Tribune Chronicle, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.tribtoday.com/news/business/2025/05/warren-buffetts-best-and-worst-investments/](https://www.tribtoday.com/news/business/2025/05/warren-buffetts-best-and-worst-investments/)
22. Warren Buffett's 60-Year Investment Journey: $100 Billion Gains, $100 Billion Missed - AInvest, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.ainvest.com/news/warren-buffett-60-year-investment-journey-100-billion-gains-100-billion-missed-2505/](https://www.ainvest.com/news/warren-buffett-60-year-investment-journey-100-billion-gains-100-billion-missed-2505/)
23. Buffett Missed Out on Google, Google Missed Out on AI - Coverager, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://coverager.com/buffett-missed-out-on-google-google-missed-out-on-ai/](https://coverager.com/buffett-missed-out-on-google-google-missed-out-on-ai/)
24. Warren Buffett's Investment Mistakes to Avoid \| Coconote, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://coconote.app/notes/e7fe42c9-585e-44a3-84a3-162b5508cd06](https://coconote.app/notes/e7fe42c9-585e-44a3-84a3-162b5508cd06)
25. Berkshire Hathaway's Disney Journey - BRK-B.com, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://brk-b.com/berkshire-hathway-s-disney-journey\_240427.html](https://brk-b.com/berkshire-hathway-s-disney-journey_240427.html)
26. Warren Buffett Didn't Buy-and-Hold These 3 Stocks, and It's Cost ..., accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/07/28/warren-buffett-didnt-buy-and-hold-these-3-stocks-a.aspx](https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/07/28/warren-buffett-didnt-buy-and-hold-these-3-stocks-a.aspx)
27. Did Warren Buffett Make a Mistake by Selling This Cheap, High-Yield Stock? \| Nasdaq, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/did-warren-buffett-make-mistake-selling-cheap-high-yield-stock](https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/did-warren-buffett-make-mistake-selling-cheap-high-yield-stock)
28. Did Warren Buffett Make a Mistake When He Sold This Stock? The Company Is on the Precipice of a Monumental Achievement \| Nasdaq, accessed May 17, 2025, [https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/did-warren-buffett-make-mistake-when-he-sold-stock-company-precipice-monumental](https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/did-warren-buffett-make-mistake-when-he-sold-stock-company-precipice-monumental)