The Rationalist and the Disrupter: Charlie Munger's Evolving Views on Donald Trump

I. Introduction: The Oracle and the Magnate

A. Setting the Stage: Munger's Intellectual Stature and Trump's Political Disruption

Charles T. Munger, the long-time Vice Chairman of Berkshire Hathaway 1, was a figure of immense intellectual stature in the worlds of business and finance. Renowned for his sharp wit, multidisciplinary approach to thinking, and candid, often trenchant, commentary, Munger was regarded by many as an oracle whose pronouncements on investing, corporate governance, and human behavior were keenly observed.1 His partnership with Warren Buffett forged one of the most successful conglomerates in history, built on principles of value investing, long-term thinking, and a distinct aversion to folly.

Donald J. Trump, in contrast, emerged as a profoundly disruptive force in American politics. A real estate magnate and television personality, his ascent to the presidency in 2016 and his subsequent term in office were characterized by a direct challenge to established political norms, a populist appeal, and a communication style that often polarized public opinion. Trump's presidency invited strong reactions from across the societal spectrum, including from prominent figures in the business and financial communities.

The juxtaposition of these two individuals – Munger, the embodiment of quiet rationality, ethical considerations, and meticulous long-term strategy, and Trump, the personification of boisterous disruption and a transactional, often improvisational, approach to leadership – makes an examination of Munger's views on Trump particularly compelling. Munger, while identifying as a Republican 1, was never a conventional partisan. His commentary, relatively infrequent in the purely political domain, tended to be rooted in his broader philosophies concerning character, decision-making efficacy, and the fundamental workings of a functional society, rather than adherence to specific party lines. Consequently, when a figure of Munger's intellectual caliber, deeply invested in rationality and long-term value creation, offered opinions on a political leader known for upending established norms, it signaled more than casual political observation; it hinted at a potential collision or, at times, an unexpected alignment of fundamental worldviews.

B. Purpose and Scope of the Report

This report aims to provide a comprehensive and analytical account of Charlie Munger's publicly expressed opinions concerning Donald Trump, tracing their evolution from initial critiques prior to Trump's presidency through to Munger's later reflections. The analysis will explore the reasoning Munger provided, connecting his statements where possible to his overarching philosophies on business ethics, leadership qualities, and rational decision-making.

The examination will follow a chronological and thematic structure, drawing upon available public records of Munger's direct quotes and reported statements. Munger's evolving perspective offers a fascinating case study of how a highly principled and pragmatic thinker navigated the complexities of a political era defined by significant disruption. His journey from sharp condemnation to a more tempered, though still critical, stance reflects an attempt to reconcile deeply held ideals with the practical realities of contemporary political leadership. This evolution underscores a complex process of evaluating a leader based not only on character and style but also on specific policy actions and their perceived impact.

To provide a clear overview of Munger's public statements over time, the following table summarizes key moments in his commentary on Donald Trump:

Table 1: Chronology of Charlie Munger's Key Public Statements on Donald Trump

II. Early Condemnation: "Vainglory and Puffery" (Circa 2011-2016)

A. Initial Foray: The 2011 CNN Interview – "The Last Person"

Charlie Munger’s first significant public comments on Donald Trump surfaced in a 2011 CNN Business interview, at a time when Trump was exploring a potential Republican bid for the 2012 presidential election and was a ubiquitous media presence, known for his bold claims about his business successes and his vocal doubts concerning President Barack Obama's birthplace.4 Munger did not mince words. When asked about Trump's suitability for the presidency, he declared, "The last person, almost, I'd want to be president of the United States is Donald Trump".4

The reasons Munger cited were rooted in his assessment of Trump's character. He pointed to "vainglory" and "puffery" as traits that he found disqualifying for the nation's highest office, adding with characteristic bluntness, "I could go on and on".4 This critique directly reflected Munger's long-held skepticism towards excessive ego and self-promotion, traits he often warned could cloud judgment and lead to poor decision-making.4 For Munger, whose own success was built on rational analysis and a degree of intellectual humility, Trump's public persona appeared antithetical to the qualities he valued in leadership.

Interestingly, Munger did concede that Trump "might be quite decisive".4 However, this potential positive was immediately overshadowed by his overarching judgment that Trump was not "an ideal decision‑maker or a manager of anything".4 This nuanced observation hinted at a sophisticated understanding of leadership: decisiveness, while potentially valuable, is insufficient if not anchored by sound judgment, intellectual rigor, and competent managerial skills—qualities Munger evidently found lacking in Trump at the time. His critique was not merely about style but about the fundamental capacity for effective governance.

B. Pre-Election Stance (2016): "Not Morally Qualified"

As the 2016 presidential election approached, Munger reiterated his critical stance on Trump. He sharpened his critique by linking Trump's business background, specifically his involvement in the casino industry, to a moral assessment of his fitness for the presidency. Munger stated, "My attitude is that anybody who makes money running a casino is not morally qualified”.5 This was not an isolated sentiment; it aligned with Munger's broader criticisms of business activities he viewed as speculative, non-productive, or ethically questionable. For instance, he famously described derivatives trading desks as "casinos in drag" 12 and was a vocal critic of cryptocurrencies, labeling Bitcoin as "noxious poison".12

This moral judgment against a casino-derived fortune as a qualification for the presidency underscores the depth of Munger's conviction. For him, the source of wealth and the nature of one's business endeavors were indicative of character and, by extension, suitability for public trust. His early condemnations of Trump, therefore, were not superficial political attacks but were deeply rooted in his core values concerning rationality, ethical conduct in business, and the essential attributes of sound leadership. Munger's plain-spoken dismissal of Trump, based on leadership style and perceived truthfulness even before the 2016 campaign gained full momentum, also presciently foreshadowed the profound societal and partisan divisions that would later crystallize around these very issues during Trump's presidency and beyond.4 He identified a fundamental disconnect in leadership approach that would become a central theme of the ensuing political discourse.

III. A Pragmatic Shift: "Not Wrong on Everything" (2017 Daily Journal Meeting)

A. The "Mellowed" Stance

A notable shift in Charlie Munger's public tone regarding Donald Trump occurred in February 2017, shortly after Trump assumed the presidency. Speaking at the annual meeting of the Daily Journal Corporation in Los Angeles, a company he chaired 5, Munger surprised many observers. He stated, "President Donald Trump is not wrong on everything," and candidly admitted, "I've gotten more mellow".4

This change in posture was significant. To those who had followed his earlier, unequivocal condemnations, this new perspective signaled a degree of adaptation. Munger advised skeptics of the new president to "roll with it," urging a tolerance for Trump's differences: "Just because he isn't like us, roll with it. And if there's a little danger, what the hell, you're not going to live forever anyway".5 This remark, tinged with Munger's characteristic dry wit and perhaps a touch of stoicism, suggested a pragmatic acceptance of the new political reality. It was less an endorsement of Trump and more an acknowledgment that, with the election decided, a different mode of engagement might be necessary. This pragmatism, a hallmark of Munger's investment philosophy where one must deal with market realities as they are, not as one wishes them to be, appeared to be influencing his public commentary on the political landscape. The "mellowed" stance could be interpreted as a conscious decision to adopt a more functional public posture now that the leadership of the country was established.

B. Finding Specific Points of Agreement: Social Security

Crucially, Munger did not offer a blanket revision of his previous views. Instead, he pointed to specific policy areas where he found common ground with the new administration. The most prominent example was Social Security. Munger explicitly praised Trump's stated position on the popular entitlement program: "When Donald Trump says he wouldn't touch Social Security when a lot of highfalutin Republicans have all kinds of schemes for (rising) Social Security, I'm with Donald Trump. If I were running the world I would have his exact attitude about Social Security. I wouldn't touch it".6

This specific point of agreement demonstrated Munger's capacity for nuanced assessment. He was able to separate a particular policy stance from his broader, and likely still held, reservations about Trump's character or overall leadership style. This approach aligns with Munger's oft-stated aversion to "extremely intense ideology," which he believed "cabbages up one's mind".13 By identifying areas of agreement, Munger was arguably practicing his own "iron prescription": the idea that one is not entitled to an opinion unless one can state the arguments against one's own position better than the opposition.13 In this context, he was acknowledging valid points or agreeable stances within the Trump agenda, thereby maintaining his credibility as a rational, non-ideological observer.

C. Contextualizing the Shift: Re-examining the Tax System

Beyond Social Security, Munger also indicated an openness to some of the Trump administration's broader policy directions. He commented that the re-examination of the country's tax system was "a very constructive thing".7 This further illustrated his willingness to evaluate individual policy initiatives on their merits, irrespective of the political figure spearheading them.

Munger's quip about "a little danger" – "if there's a little danger, what the hell, you're not going to live forever anyway" 4 – remains an intriguing element of his 2017 commentary. It could be interpreted in several ways: as a piece of characteristic Munger fatalism designed to perhaps ease anxieties in a room of investors concerned about political uncertainty; or as a subtle, understated acknowledgment that his earlier, more profound concerns about Trump's leadership hadn't entirely dissipated, even as he adopted a more pragmatic public tone. This complex statement likely blended his distinctive personality with a nuanced, ongoing assessment of the potential risks and realities of the Trump presidency.

IV. Navigating the Trump Presidency and Beyond: Specific Commentary and Late-Life Reflections (2017-2023)

A. Commentary on Specific Trump Administration Policies/Areas

Throughout Donald Trump's presidency and in the years that followed, Charlie Munger continued to offer sporadic but pointed commentary on specific policy areas and on the political climate, often reflecting his unique blend of pragmatism and principle.

• Border Control (2019): In a May 2019 interview with Yahoo Finance, Munger expressed clear agreement with the Trump administration's stance on border security. He stated, "I think we should have way more control of our borders than we do. Isn't that Donald Trump is right on that...".9 This comment underscored his capacity to align with a policy position even if he had broader reservations about the individual championing it. Consistent with his aversion to rigid partisanship, Munger also took the opportunity to critique the Democratic Party's approach, remarking, "...and I think the Democrats are committing suicide by being so they hate him so much that they're against him even when he's right".9 This observation highlights his consistent disdain for what he perceived as ideologically driven opposition that ignored the potential merits of a given policy.
• China Relations (May 2017): Earlier in Trump's term, during a May 2017 CNBC interview, Munger had expressed admiration for what he saw as a positive evolution in Trump's approach to China. He commented, "I'm a great admirer of the Trump change of mind about China. And making an ally out of China instead of screaming about their trade. So I'm a big admirer of Trump when he changes his mind constructively. And I think he'll do a lot more of it that's that's a good thing in Trump".8 This statement is significant as it praises adaptability and a willingness to alter course—qualities Munger himself valued.
• Tariffs: While direct quotes from Munger specifically addressing President Trump's tariff policies are not prevalent in the provided materials, the broader context of Berkshire Hathaway's leadership thinking offers some clues. Munger's long-time partner, Warren Buffett, voiced concerns about the use of trade as a weapon and the imposition of tariffs.15 An independent analysis also posited that Munger, based on his established economic principles—such as his understanding of trade deficits being linked to savings and investment rates, his skepticism about the ease of manufacturing reshoring, and his belief that consumers ultimately bear the cost of tariffs—would likely have been critical of such protectionist measures.17 Furthermore, Munger reportedly found one of Buffett's alternative proposals for managing trade imbalances to be "gimmicky" 15, suggesting he applied a critical eye to all trade policy ideas.
• Deregulation of Finance (2017): Demonstrating his independent thought even within his own Republican leanings, Munger voiced strong concerns in 2017 about what he perceived as excessive efforts by Republican leaders to roll back financial regulations. He bluntly stated, "My fellow Republicans — the ones taking away all this regulation of major finance — I think that's bonkers”.12 This critique, occurring during the Trump administration, showcased Munger's willingness to dissent from his party's line when he believed core principles of financial stability were at risk.

B. Late-Life Assessment (2023 Wall Street Journal Interview)

Towards the end of his life, in an interview with The Wall Street Journal in late 2023 (as reported by columnist Froma Harrop in the Minot Daily News), Munger offered a final, clarifying perspective on Donald Trump.10 Despite his earlier acknowledgments of agreement on certain policies, Munger reportedly stated that he would "never vote for him".10 This definitive stance, coming after years of observing Trump both in and out of office, suggests that for Munger, fundamental reservations about Trump's character or overall suitability for the presidency ultimately outweighed any alignment on specific issues when it came to the act of electoral endorsement.

In the same context, Munger delivered a characteristically blunt assessment of then-President Joe Biden, calling him "a typical Democratic politician" and adding, "I'm used to that type of defect".10 This remark underscores Munger's consistent willingness to apply his critical lens across the political spectrum, reinforcing his image as an independent thinker not beholden to partisan loyalties. His equal-opportunity criticism suggests a general skepticism towards political figures and a focus on perceived flaws or "defects" irrespective of party affiliation, aligning with his lifelong intellectual project of identifying and avoiding folly.13 The "never vote for him" declaration regarding Trump, juxtaposed with his pragmatic engagement during Trump's term, implies a clear distinction in Munger's mind between working within an existing political reality and actively endorsing a leader for future office—a decision where fundamental character concerns appeared to become a non-negotiable threshold.

V. Munger's Philosophical Lens: Rationality, Ethics, and Leadership Assessment

Charlie Munger's commentary on Donald Trump was not merely a series of isolated political opinions; it was an expression of a deeply ingrained philosophical framework built upon principles of rationality, ethical conduct, and a particular understanding of effective leadership. His views on Trump can be more fully appreciated when examined through this distinctive Munger lens.

A. The Primacy of Rationality and Avoiding Folly

At the core of Munger's worldview was an unwavering commitment to rationality. He famously identified being "rational" as a key to his success.20 This dedication permeated his approach to investing, business, and life, including his assessment of political figures. Munger consistently warned against the dangers of "extremely intense ideology," which he believed "cabbages up one's mind".13 His evolving public stance on Trump, particularly the shift in 2017, could be interpreted as a rational adaptation to a new political landscape. Rather than remaining entrenched in his initial condemnation, he appeared to pragmatically assess the situation as it was, focusing on observable policy directions and potential areas of common ground, thereby avoiding the folly of ideological rigidity.

Munger's "iron prescription" for forming an opinion—the requirement to be able to state the arguments against one's own position better than the opposition 13—is particularly relevant here. His 2017 comments, where he acknowledged that Trump was "not wrong on everything" 4 and found specific points of agreement such as on Social Security 7, suggest an attempt to understand and articulate the perspectives that led to Trump's election and the potential merits of some of his stances. This intellectual discipline allowed him to move beyond a purely reactive disapproval. Furthermore, his initial criticisms of Trump's "puffery" 4 can be seen as a rejection of unreliable and exaggerated communication, which violated his preference for straightforward, fact-based discourse.

B. Ethical Considerations and "Moral Qualification"

Ethical considerations were paramount for Munger. His 2016 assertion that an individual who "makes money running a casino is not morally qualified" for the presidency 5 was a stark ethical judgment. This statement aligns with his broader philosophy that "Good businesses are ethical businesses" 1 and his consistent emphasis on integrity as a cornerstone of both personal and professional life.2

The apparent tension in Munger's views—strong ethical condemnation of Trump's background versus a later pragmatic engagement with his presidency—highlights a complex challenge: how to weigh deeply held moral judgments about an individual's character against their actions and policies once they are in a position of power. Munger’s eventual reported declaration that he would "never vote for" Trump 10 suggests that, for him, these fundamental ethical concerns regarding character ultimately formed an insurmountable barrier to an electoral endorsement, even if pragmatic policy agreements were possible during an existing term.

C. Assessing Leadership Qualities: Beyond Decisiveness

Munger’s assessment of leadership extended beyond superficial traits. While he acknowledged in 2011 that Trump "might be quite decisive," this was immediately qualified by his view that Trump was not "an ideal decision-maker or a manager of anything".4 This distinction reveals that Munger sought a more profound set of leadership attributes than mere forcefulness. He valued "sober judgment" 4, managerial competence, and likely the capacity for "continuous learning" and "long-term thinking" 21—qualities he may not have consistently observed in Trump. His emphasis on avoiding leaders whose judgment is clouded by ego 4 further informed his critical perspective on Trump's "vainglory."

D. Mental Models and Trump

Munger's famed "latticework of mental models" 1 provides another framework for understanding his views.

• Inversion: Munger often employed inversion, asking not how to succeed but how to avoid failure.2 His initial criticisms of Trump, focusing on "vainglory" and "puffery," identified traits Munger likely perceived as precursors to leadership failure.
• Psychology of Human Misjudgment: Munger was a keen student of cognitive biases and the psychology of human misjudgment.1 His warnings about ego clouding judgment 4 directly relate to this. Trump's leadership style and decision-making could be analyzed through Munger's catalog of common misjudgments, such as overconfidence bias or the influence of liking/disliking tendencies on policy.
• Circle of Competence: Munger stressed the importance of operating within one's "circle of competence".2 While it's speculative how he applied this to Trump's often wide-ranging pronouncements, Munger himself was generally cautious about opining outside his areas of deep knowledge, or at least, grounding his broader views in fundamental, time-tested principles.

Munger's philosophy often highlighted the virtue of "being consistently not stupid, instead of trying to be very intelligent".25 It is conceivable that he viewed some of Trump's populist positions, such as the defense of Social Security, as politically "not stupid"—pragmatic moves that resonated with a large segment of the electorate—even if they lacked the nuanced brilliance favored by traditional policy experts. This does not imply an endorsement of Trump's overall approach but suggests a recognition of elements of unconventional political astuteness. However, the enduring tension between any perceived "constructive change" 8 or policy alignment and his fundamental assessment of Trump's character likely explains Munger's ultimate unwillingness to offer an electoral endorsement. For Munger, while policy adaptability was commendable, it might not have been sufficient to redeem what he perceived as foundational flaws in a leader's character.

VI. Conclusion: A Complex and Evolving Perspective

A. Recapitulation of Munger's Stance

Charlie Munger's public opinions on Donald Trump charted a course from unequivocal early condemnation to a more nuanced, pragmatic engagement during Trump's presidency, and ultimately culminated in a reaffirmation of fundamental reservations. Initially, in 2011 and 2016, Munger characterized Trump as almost uniquely unsuited for the presidency, citing "vainglory," "puffery," and a background in the casino business as indicators of flawed character and a lack of moral qualification for the office.4

The election of Trump prompted a noticeable shift in Munger's public tone. By early 2017, he adopted a more "mellowed" stance, famously advising skeptics to "roll with it" and acknowledging that "President Donald Trump is not wrong on everything".4 He found specific points of agreement, notably praising Trump's commitment to Social Security and his perceived constructive "change of mind" regarding China.7 Later, in 2019, he concurred with Trump's stance on needing "way more control of our borders".9 However, this pragmatic approach did not equate to a full endorsement. In a late 2023 interview, Munger reportedly stated that despite agreeing with some of Trump's policies, he would "never vote for him," a sentiment that suggested his foundational concerns about Trump's character and overall fitness for leadership remained decisive.10

B. The Interplay of Pragmatism and Principle

Munger's evolving commentary on Donald Trump was not indicative of fickleness but rather showcased the complex interplay between his deeply held principles and his inherent pragmatism. His core tenets—rationality, ethical conduct, sound judgment, and an aversion to ideological capture—were consistently evident. The initial rejection of Trump was a direct application of these principles to Trump's persona and business history. The subsequent "mellowing" can be understood as a pragmatic adaptation to an established political reality. Munger, the investor, knew one must operate within the existing market, not the one wished for. Similarly, he appeared to apply this to the political sphere, seeking areas of potential constructiveness or stability once Trump was in office. This pragmatic adjustment may also reflect a broader, perhaps less publicly articulated, tendency among some in the business and financial elite to find a modus vivendi with prevailing political leadership, irrespective of personal reservations, for the sake of operational stability or policy influence.

However, Munger's pragmatism had its limits, particularly when core values concerning leadership character were tested in the context of an electoral choice. His ultimate refusal to endorse Trump with a vote indicates that for the highest office, certain principles—likely related to character, temperament, and moral qualification—were non-negotiable for him, even if some policy alignments existed. This suggests a hierarchy in his evaluative framework: pragmatic engagement with a current reality is one matter; active endorsement for future leadership, where foundational character judgments come to the fore, is quite another.

C. Munger's Enduring Message: The Importance of Critical Thinking

Viewed in its entirety, Charlie Munger's commentary on Donald Trump serves as a compelling illustration of his lifelong advocacy for critical thinking, the avoidance of ideological echo chambers, and the necessity of assessing complex phenomena—including political leaders—across multiple dimensions. His willingness to voice nuanced, sometimes shifting, and often blunt opinions, even if they defied simple categorization, underscored his commitment to independent thought over partisan allegiance.

Munger's intellectual journey with the Trump phenomenon—from sharp disapproval to conditional acknowledgment and back to fundamental opposition for endorsement—reflects a mind constantly working to apply its "latticework of mental models" to understand and navigate a world often characterized by "human misjudgment." His statements encourage a similar rigor in others: to look beyond surface appearances, to question one's own biases, to seek understanding even in disagreement, and ultimately, to make judgments rooted in a coherent set of well-reasoned principles. In this, Munger's views on Trump, like much of his broader commentary, leave a legacy that champions intellectual honesty and the relentless pursuit of "worldly wisdom."

Works cited#

1. Charlie Munger - Wikipedia, accessed May 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Munger
2. Poor Charlie's Almanack: A Comprehensive Guide to the Wisdom of Charles T. Munger, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.1hourguide.co.za/poor-charlies-almanack/
3. en.wikipedia.org, accessed May 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Munger#:~:text=Munger%20was%20a%20Republican%20and,policies%20of%20the%20Trump%20administration.
4. Charlie Munger Once Predicted That Trump Could Be 'Quite Decisive' But Still Didn't Want Him To Be President: Here's Why - Benzinga, accessed May 11, 2025, https://in.benzinga.com/25/04/44915713/charlie-munger-once-said-he-could-go-on-and-on-listing-why-he-wont-want-donald-trump-in-the-oval-office
5. Charlie Munger wanted Donald Trump to be the last person to become US President: 'Vainglory, puffery…' | Company Business News - Mint, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.livemint.com/companies/people/charlie-munger-wanted-donald-trump-to-be-the-last-person-to-become-us-president-vainglory-puffery-11744621532785.html
6. Charles Munger critiques China, India; tells Trump haters `roll with it ..., accessed May 11, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/charles-munger-critiques-china-india-tells-trump-haters-roll-with-it/articleshow/57185131.cms
7. Charlie Munger: Full Transcript of Daily Journal Annual Meeting 2017 - Latticework Investing, accessed May 11, 2025, https://latticeworkinvesting.com/2017/02/17/charlie-munger-full-transcript-of-daily-journal-annual-meeting-2017/
8. Buffett, Munger, Gates' thoughts on President Trump - YouTube, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSLrfdglLGA
9. Charlie Munger: 'Democrats hate Trump... even when he's right' - YouTube, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkMiwF5o5Hs
10. A state different in some very good ways | News, Sports, Jobs - Minot ..., accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.minotdailynews.com/opinion/national-columnists/2023/12/a-state-different-in-some-very-good-ways/
11. Charlie Munger on Donald Trump #reaction - YouTube, accessed May 11, 2025, https://m.youtube.com/shorts/-_0HX0odzBg
12. A master of one-liners: Charlie Munger on politics, life and crypto - The Economic Times, accessed May 11, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/markets/stocks/news/a-master-of-one-liners-charlie-munger-on-politics-life-and-crypto/articleshow/105583511.cms
13. Charlie Munger on How to Lead a Successful Life | TIME, accessed May 11, 2025, https://time.com/6340573/charlie-munger-how-to-lead-a-successful-life/
14. Charlie Munger's Quotes | Glasp, accessed May 11, 2025, https://glasp.co/quotes/charlie-munger
15. In His Final Annual Meeting as Berkshire Hathaway's CEO, Warren Buffett Once Again Repudiated President Donald Trump's Tariffs | Nasdaq, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/his-final-annual-meeting-berkshire-hathaways-ceo-warren-buffett-once-again-repudiated
16. Charlie Munger's advice for volatile markets: If you can't handle swings, 'you deserve the mediocre result' - NBC10 Philadelphia, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/business/money-report/charlie-mungers-advice-for-volatile-markets-if-you-cant-handle-swings-you-deserve-the-mediocre-result/4157199/?os=vbkandref%3Dapp&ref=app&noamp=mobile
17. How Would Charlie Munger View Trump's Tariff Policy If He Were Alive? | 探险李on Binance Square, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/22856909482945
18. In His Final Annual Meeting as Berkshire Hathaway's CEO, Warren Buffett Once Again Repudiated President Donald Trump's Tariffs - FINVIZ.com, accessed May 11, 2025, https://finviz.com/news/54262/in-his-final-annual-meeting-as-berkshire-hathaways-ceo-warren-buffett-once-again-repudiated-president-donald-trumps-tariffs
19. A master of one-liners: Charlie Munger on politics, life and cryptocurrency - Financial Post, accessed May 11, 2025, https://financialpost.com/investing/charlie-munger-one-liners-politics-life-cryptocurrency
20. A Dozen Things I've Learned from Charlie Munger About Making Rational Decisions, Part 1, accessed May 11, 2025, https://cupblog.org/2015/09/15/a-dozen-things-ive-learned-from-charlie-munger-about-making-rational-decisions-part-1/
21. Thoughts on Leadership: Lessons from the late Charlie Munger, accessed May 11, 2025, https://rethinkreport.com/2023/11/30/thoughts-on-leadership-lessons-from-the-late-charlie-munger/
22. Poor Charlie's Almanack - Stripe Press, accessed May 11, 2025, https://press.stripe.com/poor-charlies-almanack
23. Deep Dive Book Summaries - Apple Podcasts, accessed May 11, 2025, https://podcasts.apple.com/ae/podcast/deep-dive-book-summaries/id1781029448
24. Charlie Munger: Wit and Wisdom From The World's Most Irreverent Billionaire, accessed May 11, 2025, https://fs.blog/intellectual-giants/charlie-munger/
25. "It's remarkable how much long-term advantage people like us have gotten by trying to be consistently not stupid, instead of trying to be very intelligent." – Charlie Munger | Trustnet, accessed May 11, 2025, https://www.trustnet.com/investing/13439117/its-remarkable-how-much-long-term-advantage-people-like-us-have-gotten-by-trying-to-be-consistently-not-stupid-instead-of-trying-to-be-very-intelligent-charlie-munger