FORENSIC VALUE INVESTING RESEARCH REPORT: NIKE, INC. (NKE)

I. Executive Summary & Variant Perception#

The Broken Compounder: A Structural or Cyclical Dislocation?#

The prevailing narrative surrounding Nike, Inc. (NKE) in late 2025 is one of a fallen angel—a once-impregnable fortress of consumer loyalty and compounding capital that has succumbed to the twin forces of innovation stagnation and strategic hubris. The consensus view, reflected in the equity trading near five-year valuation lows, suggests that the brand has permanently ceded its "cool" factor to nimble upstarts like On Holding and Hoka, while simultaneously breaking its distribution machine through an ill-advised, aggressive pivot to Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) channels. However, a rigorous forensic examination of the financial statements, earnings transcripts, and operational metrics suggests a variant perception: Nike is not in secular terminal decline, but rather in the trough of a classic, self-inflicted capital cycle reset.
The "broken compounder" thesis rests on the visible deterioration of top-line growth—revenues for the second quarter of Fiscal 2026 were effectively flat at $12.4 billion, rising just 1% on a reported basis.1 Yet, beneath this headline stagnation lies a tectonic shift in the quality and composition of that revenue which the market is currently discounting. The bullish variant perception hinges on the "Wholesale Boomerang." While the street panics over the collapse of Nike Direct revenues—down 8% reported and 9% currency-neutral, with digital sales cratering 14% 1—the forensic investor notes the robust 8% growth in Wholesale revenues.1 This bifurcation is not evidence of brand rejection, but rather a strategic realignment. The consumer is still buying Nike product; they are simply buying it where they prefer to shop, which, for the performance athlete, is often in a multi-brand environment that allows for comparative testing.

The Elevator Pitch: Variant Perception#

The market currently prices NKE as a "no-growth" utility with impaired margins. The consensus fails to appreciate three critical factors:

1. The Margin Optical Illusion: Gross margins have contracted 300 basis points to 40.6%.1 The market extrapolates this as a permanent loss of pricing power. Our analysis suggests this is a temporary function of "clearing the deck"—specifically, the deliberate reduction of "Classics" franchises (Air Force 1, Jordan 1) by over 20% to restore scarcity 2, coupled with the absorption of tariff headwinds that smaller competitors cannot sustain.
2. The Management "Put": The transition from John Donahoe—a technocratic leader who prioritized algorithms and efficiency—to Elliott Hill, a product-focused company veteran, represents a tangible catalyst for cultural restoration.2 Donahoe’s regime optimized for the income statement; Hill’s mandate is to optimize for the product, which is the long-term driver of the balance sheet.
3. The Valuation Floor: Trading at approximately ~24x depressed earnings, Nike is not "cheap" by traditional Benjamin Graham standards, but relative to its own historical average of >30x and the quality of its "Owner Earnings," the risk-reward is asymmetric.3 The dividend yield, now approaching 3% with 24 consecutive years of increases, provides a paid waiting period for the thesis to play out.1

Earnings Tone Analysis: Humility over Hubris#

A qualitative assessment of the Q2 2026 and Fiscal 2025 earnings calls reveals a distinct shift in management tone. The bravado of the "Consumer Direct Acceleration" era has been replaced by a somber focus on operational blocking and tackling. CFO Matthew Friend’s commentary regarding the "middle innings" of the turnaround acknowledges the pain of the transition.4 Management has explicitly guided for near-term pain—forecasting Q3 gross margins down 175-225 basis points—to secure long-term health.2 This willingness to take "big bath" write-downs and sacrifice short-term EPS for inventory health is a positive signal for the long-term value investor, indicating that the new leadership is not managing for the next quarter, but for the next decade.
The "Win Now" strategy, while sounding like corporate jargon, is backed by specific capital allocation decisions: a reallocation of the $4B+ demand creation budget back toward sports marketing (events, athletes) and away from digital customer acquisition costs (performance marketing).1 This shift impacts the P&L immediately as an expense, while the revenue benefit is lagged, creating a temporary earnings depression that offers an entry point.

---#

II. Circle of Competence: Business Model & Economic Moat

The Asset-Light Flywheel#

To value Nike, one must understand that it is fundamentally an intellectual property and marketing firm, not a manufacturing entity. Its circle of competence lies in the ability to arbitrage low-cost Asian manufacturing against high-value Western brand equity. The unit economics of a typical Nike shoe reveal the power of this model: a product costing $25-$30 to manufacture (FOB price) is sold to a wholesaler for $50 (wholesale price) or directly to a consumer for $100+ (retail price).
Historically, this model generated Returns on Invested Capital (ROIC) in the high 20s to low 30s percentages.5 The "moat" was believed to be the brand’s ubiquity and the "Demand Creation" budget which, at ~$4.7 billion annually 6, exceeds the total revenue of many competitors. This spend creates a barrier to entry; while a new entrant can make a good shoe, they cannot easily replicate the global cultural saturation that Nike achieves through its roster of athletes (LeBron James, Cristiano Ronaldo, et al.).

The Capital Cycle: Disruption and Reset#

The industry is currently traversing a difficult phase of the capital cycle. The post-pandemic boom led to massive capacity expansion and inventory accumulation across the sector. New entrants like On and Hoka utilized the "air umbrella" provided by Nike’s distraction with fashion to establish a beachhead in the performance running category.
Nike’s response—the "Consumer Direct Acceleration"—attempted to capture the full retail margin by bypassing wholesalers. Our analysis of the capital cycle suggests this was a misallocation of capital. By building a massive logistics and digital infrastructure to serve individual e-commerce orders, Nike bloated its SG&A and balance sheet, diluting ROIC from ~26% in 2021 to ~11.5% in 2025.7 The current pivot back to Wholesale is a recognition that the capital intensity of DTC is not accretive to shareholder value when factoring in customer acquisition and logistics costs.

Moat Analysis: Erosion or Obfuscation?#

The consensus view argues Nike’s moat has eroded. We argue it is merely obfuscated by poor cyclical execution.

• Scale Advantage: Nike’s revenue of ~$46-51 billion dwarfs the competition.8 In a supply chain crisis or a tariff war, scale is a distinct advantage. Nike can absorb a $1.5 billion tariff impact 9 that would bankrupt a smaller player.
• Network Effect: The "Swoosh" benefits from a social network effect. The more people wear it, the more accepted it is. However, this works in reverse; as "cool" kids shift to Hoka, the network effect dampens. The critical variable is "product heat." The "Sport Offense" aims to reignite this by focusing on innovation cycles (Air, ZoomX) rather than retro mining.

Unit Economics: Wholesale vs. Direct#

The core of the financial tension lies in the margin mix.

• Wholesale: Lower Gross Margin (~40%) but extremely low Operating Expense. The retailer bears the cost of rent, sales staff, and inventory holding. Result: High Operating Margin.
• Direct: High Gross Margin (~60%+) but massive Operating Expense (shipping, returns, digital marketing, store leases). Result: Often Lower Operating Margin.
• Insight: The pivot back to wholesale 1 should optically compress gross margins (which scares the algorithm-driven traders) but expand operating margins and ROIC (which attracts the value investor). The "Gross Margin" decline of 300bps in Q2 2026 is partially a mix shift effect that is actually healthy for the bottom line long-term.

---#

III. Forensic Financial Analysis

Income Statement Forensics: The Quality of Earnings#

A deep dive into the income statement reveals several red flags and green shoots that the headline numbers obscure.

• Revenue Quality: The divergence between reported revenue (+1%) and inventory decline (-3%) is a positive forensic signal.1 It suggests Nike is selling through product faster than it is bringing it in, a necessary condition for margin stabilization. However, the heavy reliance on "promotions" mentioned in the transcripts 10 indicates that the quality of that revenue is lower—Nike is buying revenue with price cuts.
• Demand Creation Efficiency: A critical forensic metric is the ratio of Demand Creation Expense growth to Revenue Growth. In Q2 2026, Demand Creation spiked 13% to $1.3 billion, while revenue grew only 1%.1
• Interpretation: This is highly inefficient. Nike is spending aggressively just to stand still. While management frames this as "investment," a skeptic would view it as "maintenance capex" for the brand—the cost to stay relevant has structurally increased due to fragmentation in the media landscape and competition.

Balance Sheet Forensics: The Working Capital Trap#

The balance sheet holds the smoking gun for the recent underperformance.

• Days Sales Outstanding (DSO): Historically, Nike operated with a DSO of ~30-33 days. Recent data shows this metric expanding to ~43 days.11
• Forensic Alert: A rising DSO in a flat revenue environment is a classic warning sign of "channel stuffing"—shipping product to retailers earlier than needed or extending payment terms to artificially boost quarterly revenue figures. Given the pivot back to Wholesale (+8% revenue), an increase in DSO is expected (wholesalers pay later than DTC consumers), but the magnitude of the jump warrants close monitoring. If DSO continues to expand without a commensurate rise in sell-through, it suggests retailers are choked with inventory.
• Inventory Composition: Total inventory is down 3% 1, but the composition matters. Management notes that "units are down high single digits".2 This implies the value per unit in inventory is higher—likely due to product mix or higher input costs capitalized into inventory. The risk is if this higher-cost inventory meets a deflationary consumer environment, leading to future write-downs.

Cash Flow Analysis: Capex vs. Depreciation#

A notable anomaly appears in the Cash Flow Statement. Capital Expenditures (Capex) have plummeted to ~$430-517 million over the trailing twelve months, significantly below the Depreciation & Amortization (D&A) run rate of ~$780 million.12

• Implication: Nike is currently under-investing in its asset base relative to the rate at which those assets are depreciating. This boosts Free Cash Flow (FCF) in the short term, making the "Owner Earnings" look better.
• Sustainability: This is not sustainable in perpetuity. However, considering the massive Capex cycle Nike just completed (building the "Consumer Direct" logistics network), a period of "sweating the assets" is rational. The current FCF yield of ~3.5-5.9% 14 is somewhat inflated by this Capex holiday.

The Stock-Based Compensation (SBC) Adjustment#

Nike creates significant "earnings" that are paid out in stock. SBC over the last twelve months was ~$709 million.15

• Forensic Adjustment: While GAAP treats this as a non-cash expense, it is a very real economic cost to shareholders via dilution (or the cash cost of buybacks to offset it). When calculating "Owner Earnings," we must treat SBC as a cash expense. Despite this, Nike has successfully reduced its share count from 1.69 billion in 2016 to 1.48 billion in 2025 16, indicating that buybacks are more than offsetting dilution—a shareholder-friendly use of capital.

Shenanigans Check: The Tax Rate Volatility#

The effective tax rate has been highly volatile, swinging from ~13% to ~21% in recent quarters due to "changes in earnings mix" and "one-time benefits".1

• Analysis: This volatility often masks the true operating tax rate. The Q2 2026 rate of 20.7% 1 is a more realistic baseline than the artificially low rates seen in Fiscal 2024. Investors modeling future cash flows should use a normalized 18-20% rate rather than extrapolating low-tax quarters.

---#

IV. Management & Incentives

The Leadership Pivot: Product vs. Process#

The recent replacement of CEO John Donahoe with Elliott Hill is the single most important qualitative factor in the thesis.

• John Donahoe (The Technocrat): Coming from eBay and ServiceNow, Donahoe viewed Nike as a platform. His strategy relied on data analytics, digital ecosystem expansion, and operational efficiency. While this drove margins initially, it eroded the "magic" of the brand. Under his tenure, the "Classic" franchises were over-commercialized to hit quarterly targets.
• Elliott Hill (The Shoe Dog): A Nike veteran who started as an intern, Hill represents the "heart" of the company.2 His return signals a shift back to the "Category Offense"—organizing the company by sport (Basketball, Running, Soccer) rather than by channel.
• Scuttlebutt: Industry sources and forum discussions suggest that the internal culture had become "toxic" and "political" under the previous regime, with a disconnect between the Beaverton HQ and the athletes.18 Hill’s primary task is cultural rehabilitation. A motivated product team is the leading indicator of innovation.

Incentive Structure Analysis#

A review of the 2024 Proxy Statement reveals the incentive structure that drove previous behavior.20

• Metrics: Executive compensation has historically been tied heavily to Revenue Growth and EPS, with Total Shareholder Return (TSR) modifiers.
• The Flaw: This structure incentivized the "growth at any cost" push into DTC. By recognizing revenue at the full retail price (Direct) rather than the wholesale price, management could inflate top-line growth even if it required higher SG&A.
• The Shift: We look for the next proxy statement to see if the Board incorporates ROIC or Inventory Turns as primary metrics. The current mention of "cost savings" and "margin recovery" in guidance suggests a realignment is already happening de facto, even if not yet codified in the LTIP.

Insider Ownership & Control#

Nike operates with a dual-class share structure. The Class A shares (which elect 75% of the board) are largely held by Phil Knight and his son Travis Knight.22

• Implication: Nike is effectively a family-controlled business. This provides insulation against short-term activist pressure but creates "Key Man" risk. The fact that the Knights orchestrated the return of Hill suggests they recognized the existential threat to the brand's soul.

---#

V. Munger’s Inversion: The Pre-Mortem

To rigorously test the thesis, we apply Charlie Munger’s technique of inversion: Assume Nike has failed five years from now. What happened?

1. The Innovation Trap (The "Nokia Moment")#

The most lethal risk is that Nike has permanently lost its innovation edge. The running boom of the 2020s was defined by "Super Shoes" (carbon plates) and "Max Cushion" (Hoka). Nike was late to the latter. If the consumer preference has shifted structurally away from Nike's narrow fits and aggressive styling toward the "blobby" aesthetic of Hoka and On, Nike’s marketing spend is throwing money into a black hole.

• Evidence: The persistent decline in the "Running" category relative to competitors suggests this is not just a cycle, but a product-market fit issue. If the new "Pegasus" and "Vaporfly" updates fail to arrest this slide, the brand becomes a "lifestyle only" entity—a much lower multiple business.

2. The China Decoupling (Geopolitical Beta)#

Nike generates ~15% of revenue from Greater China, but this region historically provided >30% of the growth.23

• The Failure Mode: Revenue in China fell 16% in Q2 2026, with Digital down 36%.2 While management blames the macro environment, the rise of "Guochao" (nationalist consumption) favors local champions like Anta and Li-Ning. If Nike becomes a political pawn or if Chinese youth permanently reject Western brands, a massive chunk of the growth thesis evaporates. A "China Zero" scenario would require a complete repricing of the stock to ~15x earnings.

3. The Tariff Tax#

Management has flagged a potential $1.5 billion annualized headwind from new tariffs.9

• The Failure Mode: If Nike cannot pass these costs on to consumers (due to weak brand power) or suppliers (due to inflation), gross margins could permanently settle in the high 30s rather than the mid 40s. This structural reset of profitability would compress the P/E multiple significantly.

---#

VI. 10-Year Financial Data: The Story in the Numbers

The quantitative history of Nike reveals the erosion of its "Compounder" status and the necessity of the current reset.

Historical Financial Performance (2016-2025)#

Data Sources: 7

Interpreting the Decade#

1. The ROIC Collapse: The most damning chart for Nike is the decline in ROIC from 28% in 2016 to 11.5% today.7 This confirms that the billions spent on DTC infrastructure, digital apps, and stock buybacks at high valuations have destroyed shareholder value relative to the capital employed. The "turnaround" is essentially a project to restore ROIC to the 20% level.
2. The Buyback Crutch: Revenue has grown, but Net Income in 2025 ($3.2B) is actually lower than in 2016 ($3.8B).6 The only reason EPS has held up ($2.16 vs $2.16) is the aggressive reduction in share count. This is "financial engineering" rather than organic value creation.
3. Margin Degradation: The structural slide in Gross Margin from 46.2% to 42.7% 6 reflects the loss of pricing power. The bull case requires a belief that this can return to 45%.

---#

VII. Deep Value Checklist Assessment

Overall Assessment: Nike is not a "Deep Value" stock in the Graham sense (net-net). It is a "Quality Turnaround" play. The safety comes from the brand durability, not the multiple.

---#

VIII. Valuation

Method 1: The "Owner Earnings" Approach (Buffett Style)#

We strip away the accounting noise to find the true cash generation.

• Net Income (TTM): $3.22 Billion
• (+) Depreciation & Amortization: $0.78 Billion 13
• (-) Maintenance Capex: ~$0.50 Billion (Normalized) 12
• (+/-) Working Capital: Assumed neutral (Inventory liquidation generates cash, but receivables consume it).
• (-) Stock Based Comp: $0.71 Billion (Real cost) 15
• Adjusted Owner Earnings: ~$2.79 Billion

At a market cap of ~$85 Billion, this implies a Yield of ~3.3%.

• Comparison: The 10-Year Treasury yields ~4.2%. Nike is trading rich to the risk-free rate based on current distressed earnings.
• The Bet: You are paying a premium today for the belief that Owner Earnings will double as margins recover and the China drag lessens. If Net Income returns to 2022 levels ($6.0B), Owner Earnings jump to ~$6.0B, creating a ~7% Yield on today’s cost basis.

Method 2: The Reverse DCF (Expectations Investing)#

What is the market pricing in at $67/share?

• WACC: 8.6% 28
• Terminal Growth: 3.0%
• Required Free Cash Flow Growth: To justify $67, Nike needs to grow FCF by ~12% annually for the next 10 years.
• Verdict: The market is optimistic. 12% growth requires both revenue acceleration (to ~5-6%) AND significant margin expansion. Any stumble in the turnaround will punish the stock.

Valuation Conclusion#

Nike is not undervalued based on current numbers. It is undervalued based on normalized numbers. The investor is buying a call option on Elliott Hill’s ability to fix the operations, with the downside protected by the dividend and the asset-light balance sheet.

---#

IX. Content Creation Assets

A. Python Script: The "Owner Earnings" Sensitivity Model#

This script allows the analyst to toggle the "Recovery Rate" of gross margins and calculate the impact on intrinsic value.

Python

# Nike Forensic Valuation Model
# Calculates Intrinsic Value based on Margin Recovery Scenarios

def calculate_intrinsic_value(revenue, gross_margin, sga_rate, tax_rate, share_count, target_multiple):
gross_profit = revenue * gross_margin
sga = revenue * sga_rate
operating_income = gross_profit - sga
net_income = operating_income * (1 - tax_rate)
eps = net_income / share_count
intrinsic_value = eps * target_multiple
return eps, intrinsic_value

# Current TTM Metrics (Billions / %)
revenue_base = 46.3
shares = 1.48

# Scenarios
scenarios = {
"Status Quo (Bear)": {"gm": 0.427, "sga": 0.34, "tax": 0.20, "mult": 20},
"Recovery (Base)": {"gm": 0.445, "sga": 0.32, "tax": 0.18, "mult": 25},
"Peak (Bull)": {"gm": 0.460, "sga": 0.30, "tax": 0.16, "mult": 30}
}

print(f"{'Scenario':<20} | {'EPS':<6} | {'Target Price':<12} | {'Upside/Downside'}")
print("-" * 60)

current_price = 67.00 # Approximate

for name, params in scenarios.items():
eps, val = calculate_intrinsic_value(revenue_base, params["gm"], params["sga"], params["tax"], shares, params["mult"])
upside = ((val - current_price) / current_price) * 100
print(f"{name:<20} | ${eps:.2f} | ${val:.2f} | {upside:.1f}%")

B. Summary Card: The Investment Thesis#

C. Visualizing the Revenue Divergence#

(Description for Chart Construction)

• X-Axis: Fiscal Quarters (Q1 '24 - Q2 '26)
• Line 1 (Red): Nike Direct Revenue Growth (Trending Negative, currently -8%)
• Line 2 (Green): Wholesale Revenue Growth (Trending Positive, currently +8%)
• Annotation: The crossover point in late 2025 marks the "Wholesale Boomerang" pivot point—the key forensic signal for the thesis.

---

DISCLAIMER: This report is for educational purposes only. It represents a forensic analysis of publicly available data and does not constitute financial advice. The author may hold positions in the securities mentioned.

Works cited#

1. NIKE, Inc. Reports Fiscal 2026 Second Quarter Results - Nike Investor Relations, accessed December 23, 2025, https://investors.nike.com/investors/news-events-and-reports/investor-news/investor-news-details/2025/NIKE-Inc--Reports-Fiscal-2026-Second-Quarter-Results/default.aspx
2. NIKE Q2 Earnings Call Highlights - MarketBeat, accessed December 23, 2025, https://www.marketbeat.com/instant-alerts/nike-q2-earnings-call-highlights-2025-12-22/
3. NIKE vs Steven Madden: How Two Footwear Leaders Stack Up for Investors, accessed December 23, 2025, https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/2793599/nike-vs-steven-madden-how-two-footwear-leaders-stack-up-for-investors
4. Nike targets double-digit EBIT margins through sport offense and operational efficiency, accessed December 23, 2025, https://seekingalpha.com/news/4533226-nike-targets-double-digit-ebit-margins-through-sport-offense-and-operational-efficiency
5. Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) - NIKE (NKE) - MLQ.ai | AI for investors, accessed December 23, 2025, https://mlq.ai/stocks/NKE/roic/
6. NIKE, Inc. Reports Fiscal 2025 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results, accessed December 23, 2025, https://investors.nike.com/investors/news-events-and-reports/investor-news/investor-news-details/2025/NIKE-Inc--Reports-Fiscal-2025-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-Results/default.aspx
7. Return on Invested Capital For Nike Inc (NKE) - Finbox, accessed December 23, 2025, https://finbox.com/NYSE:NKE/explorer/roic/
8. NYSE: NKE - NIKE stock analysis and financials - FullRatio, accessed December 23, 2025, https://fullratio.com/stocks/nyse-nke/nike
9. Nike Inc Earnings - Analysis & Highlights for Q2 2025 - AlphaSense, accessed December 23, 2025, https://www.alpha-sense.com/earnings/nke/
10. NIKE Q2 Earnings & Revenues Beat Estimates, Digital Revenues Down 14% - Nasdaq, accessed December 23, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/nike-q2-earnings-revenues-beat-estimates-digital-revenues-down-14
11. Days Sales Outstanding For Nike Inc (NKE) - Finbox, accessed December 23, 2025, https://finbox.com/NYSE:NKE/explorer/days_sales_out/
12. Capital Expenditures For Nike Inc (NKE_KZ) - Finbox, accessed December 23, 2025, https://finbox.com/KAS:NKE_KZ/explorer/capex
13. Depreciation Amortization - Nike Inc (NYSE:NKE) - Alpha Spread, accessed December 23, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nyse/nke/financials/cash-flow-statement/depreciation-amortization
14. Free Cash Flow Yield For Nike Inc (NKE) - Finbox, accessed December 23, 2025, https://finbox.com/NYSE:NKE/explorer/fcf_yield_ltm/
15. NIKE Stock-Based Compensation 2012-2025 | NKE - Macrotrends, accessed December 23, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/NKE/nike/stock-based-compensation
16. NIKE Shares Outstanding 2012-2025 | NKE - Macrotrends, accessed December 23, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/NKE/nike/shares-outstanding
17. The Great Swoosh Reset: A Deep-Dive into Nike's (NKE) 2025 Turnaround Strategy, accessed December 23, 2025, https://markets.financialcontent.com/wral/article/predictstreet-2025-12-18-the-great-swoosh-reset-a-deep-dive-into-nikes-nke-2025-turnaround-strategy
18. Nike (NKE) – Dividend Strength and a Misread Setup in 2025 : r/ValueInvesting - Reddit, accessed December 23, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ValueInvesting/comments/1k38dfi/nike_nke_dividend_strength_and_a_misread_setup_in/
19. Does anyone know what the Nike work culture is like? : r/askportland - Reddit, accessed December 23, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/askportland/comments/1mm5joo/does_anyone_know_what_the_nike_work_culture_is/
20. NIKE, Inc. Executive Compensation - NKE - Discounting Cash Flows, accessed December 23, 2025, https://discountingcashflows.com/company/NKE/executive-compensation/
21. NIKE, Inc. 2024 Proxy Statement, accessed December 23, 2025, https://materials.proxyvote.com/NIKE/NPS24
22. NKE - Nike Inc - Proxy Statement (definitive) (DEF 14A) - ADVFN, accessed December 23, 2025, https://br.advfn.com/bolsa-de-valores/nyse/NKE/share-news/27694048/nike-inc-proxy-statement-definitive-def-14a
23. Revenue Breakdown - NIKE (NKE) - MLQ.ai, accessed December 23, 2025, https://mlq.ai/stocks/NKE/revenue-segments/
24. nike, inc. ten year financial history, accessed December 23, 2025, https://s1.q4cdn.com/806093406/files/doc_financials/2021/FY20-10-Year-History.pdf
25. nike, inc. ten year financial history, accessed December 23, 2025, https://s1.q4cdn.com/806093406/files/doc_financials/2021/FY21-10-Year-History.pdf
26. 2024 ANNUAL REPORT AND NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING - SEC.gov, accessed December 23, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320187/000130817924000659/nke4278571-ars.pdf
27. NIKE EPS - Earnings per Share 2012-2025 | NKE - Macrotrends, accessed December 23, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/NKE/nike/eps-earnings-per-share-diluted
28. Nike (NKE) WACC % - GuruFocus, accessed December 23, 2025, https://www.gurufocus.com/term/wacc/NKE