On Bubble Watch: An Institutional Analysis of Howard Marks' 2025 Market Thesis

I. Introduction: The Bellwether of Prudence#

In the world of institutional investing, the periodic memos from Oaktree Capital's Howard Marks are considered essential reading. They are not market-timing calls or simple forecasts, but rather masterclasses in "second-level thinking"-a disciplined process of examining market dynamics beyond the superficial narrative.¹ For decades, Marks has established a reputation not as a predictor, but as a discerning observer of market cycles and, most critically, investor psychology. His writings are treated by professionals as "white papers" that provide a framework for navigating complex environments.³

It is within this context that his memo of January 7, 2025, On Bubble Watch, commands significant attention. The document's publication was no coincidence, arriving exactly 25 years after his famously prescient January 2000 memo, bubble.com.⁴ That earlier work warned of the "irrational behavior" in technology and internet stocks and became legendary for being both "right, and right fast".⁷ This 25-year anniversary provides a powerful narrative backdrop, compelling the investment community to ask whether history is, as Marks often suggests, beginning to "rhyme".¹⁰

The very decision by an investor of Marks' stature and famously prudent disposition to publish a memo with this title functions as a market signal in itself. Given his track record and his focus on risk management over speculative gain, the act of dedicating a major piece of writing to the subject of bubbles indicates that, in his view, the market's "temperature" has risen to a level that warrants serious, structured assessment.¹² It suggests the balance between risk and reward has shifted, compelling investors to move beyond first-level conclusions and rigorously examine the assumptions underpinning the current market structure.

This report provides an exhaustive, multi-faceted analysis of the On Bubble Watch memo. It will deconstruct its central thesis, place it in historical context by comparing it to the bubble.com memo, situate it within the broader macroeconomic landscape of 2025, and examine its strategic implications for institutional and sophisticated investors.

II. Anatomy of a Bubble: Deconstructing the "On Bubble Watch" Memo#

The Central Thesis: A State of Mind, Not a Calculation#

The foundational argument of On Bubble Watch is that a market bubble is not a quantitative event but a psychological one. Marks posits that a bubble is best understood as a "temporary mania" and that a "psychological diagnosis is more effective" than a purely numerical one.⁷ In his view, a bubble is a period when "extreme events cause people to lose their objectivity and view the world through highly skewed psychology".⁵ This state of mind is characterized by four key elements:

1. Highly irrational exuberance.¹⁴

2. Adoration of the subject assets and an unwavering belief that they "can't miss".¹⁴

3. A massive Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) that supplants the traditional fear of losing money, causing risk aversion to evaporate.¹³

4. A resulting conviction that "there's no price too high" for the favored assets. For Marks, hearing this phrase, or a more disciplined variant like "of course there's a price that's too high, but we're not there yet," is the surest sign that a bubble is forming.⁷

The Evidence Presented: Signs of Froth in 2025#

Marks methodically lays out the data points that place the market on "bubble watch," even if he stops short of a definitive declaration.

• Extreme Market Concentration: The seven largest stocks in the S&P 500-the "Magnificent Seven"-accounted for 32-33% of the index's market capitalization. This is double their share from five years prior and substantially higher than the 20-22% concentration of leading TMT stocks at the 2000 peak.⁵ Furthermore, U.S. stocks reached over 70% of the MSCI World Index, a concentration not seen since 1970, indicating a powerful trend of U.S. market dominance.⁵

• Elevated Valuations: The S&P 500's forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio stood at approximately 22x. Historical data presented in the memo from J.P. Morgan Asset Management shows that when the S&P 500 was purchased at similar P/E ratios, the subsequent 10-year annualized returns were consistently in a tight, anemic range of +2% to -2%.²¹ This suggests future returns may be muted from current levels.

• The Narrative of "Newness": Artificial intelligence (AI) serves as the powerful, world-changing innovation fueling today's market enthusiasm. Marks argues that the defining danger of "newness" is the lack of historical precedent, which removes any natural "tether to temper enthusiasm".⁵ This absence of a map is a "great precursor for the kind of enthusiasm that sometimes leads to bubbles".¹³

• Speculative Behavior and Indiscriminate Buying: As ancillary evidence of a risk-on environment, Marks points to the 465% rise in Bitcoin's price over the preceding two years as a sign of diminished caution.¹⁶ He also raises the possibility that the rise of passive index funds and ETFs contributes to "automated buying" that pushes up prices of the largest index constituents without regard for their intrinsic value.¹⁴

The Counterarguments (from within the Memo): Why This May Not Be a Bubble#

In his characteristically balanced approach, Marks presents the bull case, acknowledging the factors that differentiate the current environment from past manias.

• Valuations are "Lofty but Not Nutty": While acknowledging that prices are high, Marks refrains from calling them "insane".¹¹ This suggests a degree of froth but not a complete detachment from reality.

• The Magnificent Seven are Truly Magnificent: Unlike the profitless dot-com companies of 2000, today's market leaders are "incredible companies" with fortress-like balance sheets, dominant market positions, massive scale, and high profitability. Their steep valuations, the argument goes, may be warranted by their superior quality and growth prospects.¹⁶

• Absence of the Key Psychological Tell: Most critically, Marks states, "I don't hear people saying, 'there's no price too high'".¹⁶ The absence of this ultimate capitulation to speculative fervor is, for him, the key missing ingredient for a full-fledged bubble.

The very quality of the market leaders in 2025 creates a paradox that makes the environment more deceptive than past bubbles. In the dot-com era, many firms lacked profits or even revenue, making their multi-billion dollar valuations transparently absurd to a disciplined analyst.²⁷ Today, the market is led by some of the most profitable and dominant companies in history. This provides a powerful, rational-sounding justification for their high valuations. The "grain of truth" that Marks says underlies every bubble is much larger and more compelling this time around.¹³ This makes it more difficult for investors to discern where legitimate fundamentals end and speculative excess begins. The narrative of quality and dominance can easily mask the dangerous assumption being priced in-namely, that of perpetual, uninterrupted leadership and growth. A potential bubble in high-quality assets is thus more insidious because the rationalizations are stronger, potentially drawing in a wider range of investors and lasting longer than a bubble in purely speculative assets.

Furthermore, Marks' deliberate structure of presenting arguments and counterarguments is not a sign of indecision but a sophisticated rhetorical device. He explicitly states his goal is not to declare a bubble but to "suggest how you might think about them".⁴ By laying out the conflicting evidence, he forces the reader to engage in the second-level thinking he champions, moving beyond a simple binary question to a more nuanced assessment of probabilities and risks. The memo is a tool for calibrating judgment, not a substitute for it.

III. Historical Echoes: "bubble.com" (2000) vs. "On Bubble Watch" (2025)#

Comparing the 2025 memo with its legendary 2000 predecessor reveals both the consistency of Marks' psychological framework and the evolution of the market landscape.

A Side-by-Side Comparison#

The shift in Marks' tone and focus over 25 years is telling. In 2000, his tone was more direct, warning of "overwhelming" evidence and likening his cautionary stance to "standing in front of a freight train".¹⁵ His conclusion was an unambiguous call for skepticism. In 2025, the tone is more Socratic and circumspect. He carefully disclaims expertise in technology and equities, framing the memo as a thought exercise for the reader.⁷

This change reflects the increased complexity of the market environment. In 2000, the core concern was viability. Marks questioned whether many dot-coms, with no profits and flimsy business models, could ever be profitable.²⁸ The irrationality was overt. In 2025, the concern has shifted to

valuation. He acknowledges the leaders are "incredible companies," so the central question is no longer "will they survive?" but "what is a sustainable price for perpetual dominance?".¹⁶ Valuation risk is a far more subtle and debatable concept than viability risk, demanding a more nuanced tone. The shift in Marks' approach is therefore an analytical choice reflecting this ambiguity, not a sign of diminished conviction.

While the fundamental business models have evolved from profitless concepts to cash-generating behemoths, the underlying investor psychology rhymes. The 2000 memo detailed a "lottery ticket mentality," a "mania-within-a-mania" for IPOs, and a powerful "fear of missing out".²⁸ The 2025 memo highlights the same psychological drivers-FOMO, the allure of a "new" thing (AI), and the narrative of world-changing potential-as the fuel for today's froth.

The aftermath of the bubble.com memo serves as a stark reminder of the potential stakes. The NASDAQ Composite lost 39% in 2000 alone, and the vast majority of the high-flying internet companies of the era ended up worthless, some losing 99% of their value.²⁷

IV. The Marksian Framework: A Philosophy of Cycles, Psychology, and Risk#

On Bubble Watch is not a standalone piece but an application of the consistent investment philosophy Marks has developed over a 50-year career. Understanding this underlying framework is crucial to interpreting the memo correctly.

The Psychology of Manias#

At the heart of Marks' framework is a deep appreciation for the psychological frailties that drive market extremes. He repeatedly cites the observation from Charles Kindleberger that "there is nothing so disturbing to one's well-being and judgment as to see a friend get rich".⁷ This envy-driven FOMO is the force that "unhinges" investors from their standard risk aversion.¹³ This is amplified by the power of "newness." When a new paradigm like AI emerges, there is no historical data to "temper enthusiasm," allowing the "this time is different" narrative to take hold and justify any valuation.⁵ This creates a social pressure to conform, which Marks likens to the fable of

The Emperor's New Clothes, where citizens are afraid to admit they don't see the suit for fear of being marked as unintelligent.⁵

The Three Stages of a Bull Market#

Marks frequently uses a simple but powerful maxim to diagnose the market's psychological temperature: the three stages of a bull market.⁷

• Stage 1: Following a crash, only a few insightful investors can imagine improvement.

• Stage 2: As the economy and markets recover, most people accept that improvement is taking place.

• Stage 3: After a period of wildly positive news and returns, "everyone concludes that things can only get better forever."

The market environment of 2023-2025, characterized by strong returns and widespread optimism around AI, places it firmly in the latter part of Stage 2, with clear signs of transitioning into the more dangerous Stage 3.

The Primacy of Price: "It's Not What You Buy, It's What You Pay"#

This is the cornerstone of the Marksian framework. He insists that "Good investing doesn't come from buying good things, but from buying things well".²⁰ This principle was forged during his "baptism under fire" in the Nifty Fifty bubble of the 1960s and 70s, where he witnessed investors lose over 90% on "great" companies they had purchased at P/E ratios of 60-90x.¹³ This experience cemented his belief that "there's no asset so good that it can't become overpriced and thus dangerous".²⁰ This is his fundamental warning against paying any price for even the highest-quality companies and serves as a direct challenge to the "buy the Magnificent Seven at any cost" narrative.

It is critical to recognize that this entire framework is viewed through the lens of a credit and distressed debt investor. The primary goal of a credit investor is capital preservation-getting the principal back with interest. The upside is contractually capped, while the downside can be a total loss. This profession naturally cultivates an intense focus on downside risk, margin of safety, and the price paid for an asset.¹³ When Marks analyzes equities, he brings this debt-investor mindset with him. He views high-P/E stocks not with an eye toward their unlimited upside potential, but through the lens of their high embedded expectations and, therefore, the significant risk of disappointment. His philosophy will always prioritize avoiding losers over trying to pick the biggest winners, a stark contrast to the venture capital mindset that often permeates growth-stock investing.³

V. The 2025 Crucible: Macroeconomic and Market Context#

The warnings in On Bubble Watch do not exist in a vacuum. They are amplified by a particularly challenging and uncertain macroeconomic environment in 2025, a context Marks explores in other memos from the same year.

The Tariff Question and Geopolitical Uncertainty#

In his April 2025 memo, Nobody Knows (Yet Again), Marks describes the potential re-imposition of broad tariffs as a "seismic but unpredictable" shock to the global system.¹⁸ Unlike fundamental economic cycles, tariffs introduce a host of non-fundamental risks, including retaliatory measures, rising inflation, supply chain disruption, and the potential for a global recession.³⁷ This leaves the market in a state of "limbo".³⁸ This heightened uncertainty logically demands a higher risk premium from investors, which puts downward pressure on asset valuations.⁴¹

The Inflation and Interest Rate Conundrum#

The economic picture in mid-2025 is uniquely conflicted. Tariff-related price pressures threaten to re-ignite inflation, even as broader economic growth shows signs of slowing.³⁹ This places the U.S. Federal Reserve in an exceptionally difficult position, caught between its dual mandate to maintain price stability and support maximum employment.⁴² The uncertainty over the Fed's future path-whether it will cut rates to stimulate a slowing economy or hold firm to combat inflation-creates significant volatility and makes it nearly impossible to confidently determine the appropriate discount rate for valuing future corporate earnings.³⁹

The Credit Alternative: "Gimme Credit"#

This macro uncertainty adds weight to the argument Marks makes in his March 2025 memo, Gimme Credit.¹⁸ In it, he posits that credit instruments, both public and private, offer a more attractive risk-adjusted return than equities. He argues that even at historically narrow credit spreads, the absolute yields available (e.g., 7-10%) are high enough to compensate for default risk and appear favorable compared to the low single-digit prospective returns implied by the equity market's high valuations.³⁶ This provides crucial context for

On Bubble Watch: Marks' caution on equities is reinforced by his conviction that a more attractive, defensive alternative exists.

The 2025 macro environment thus acts as a "fragility amplifier." A market with high valuations is already vulnerable to a correction if growth expectations are missed. A highly concentrated market is vulnerable to idiosyncratic risk in a few key names. The introduction of an unpredictable macro shock like tariffs creates a potential "pin" to prick this vulnerability. The combination is synergistic: the tariff shock is more dangerous because valuations are high and the market is concentrated; the high valuations are more precarious because of the tariff shock. The overall market risk is therefore greater than the sum of its individual parts.

VI. The Great Debate: Commentary, Critiques, and Rebuttals#

Marks' memo has ignited a robust debate that cuts to the core of fundamental investment philosophies.

The Bull Case: "This Time Is Different"#

The strongest counterarguments to Marks' cautious thesis center on the unique quality of today's market leaders. Unlike the speculative, profitless companies of the dot-com era, the Magnificent Seven possess fortress-like balance sheets, wide economic moats, and produce enormous cash flows.³ Bulls argue their valuations, while high, are justified by this superior quality and their exposure to secular growth trends like AI. Some analysts further contend that the entire S&P 500 is structurally more profitable today than in the past, with higher sustained profit margins, and thus deserves a permanently higher valuation multiple.⁴⁸

A more philosophical critique, prevalent in investor forums, targets Marks' core tenet. It argues that his intense focus on purchase price is a product of his distressed-debt background and undervalues the immense power of owning a truly great compounding business for the very long term.³⁵ For a company that can grow for decades, the initial purchase price becomes less relevant over time. This view is supported by the mathematical reality of asymmetric returns: a single investment that increases 10-fold or more can offset numerous other losses, suggesting that finding the big winners is more important than avoiding all losers.³⁵

The Bear Case and the Retail Perspective#

Conversely, many commentators agree with Marks that the psychological indicators of a late-stage bull market are present and that the extreme concentration is a classic warning sign.³ They adhere to the principle that high valuations are the enemy of high future returns and that a reversion to the mean is inevitable.²¹

Discussions among retail investors on platforms like Reddit reveal a more nuanced view.³ While there is immense respect for Marks, some question the applicability of his advice, correctly noting that his expertise is in debt, not equities.³ A common refrain is that "perma-bears" are always calling for a crash and that being too early with a warning is functionally the same as being wrong.³ However, more sophisticated participants correctly identify that Marks is not

predicting a crash. Instead, he is identifying an environment of elevated risk and low prospective returns, which is a different and more useful exercise.

Ultimately, the debate over On Bubble Watch is not about a single right or wrong answer. It is a manifestation of a fundamental clash between two distinct investment philosophies: the Value/Risk Control school championed by Marks and the Growth/Quality Compounding school. The former, rooted in the work of Benjamin Graham, prioritizes margin of safety and avoiding permanent capital loss. The latter, exemplified by investors like Philip Fisher, prioritizes identifying the few exceptional companies that will drive returns for decades. An investor's reaction to the memo is likely predetermined by their own philosophical alignment, making On Bubble Watch a Rorschach test for the investment community.

VII. Strategic Implications: Portfolio Allocation in a Concentrated, Frothy Market#

The primary takeaway from On Bubble Watch is not to sell everything, but to think critically about portfolio construction and risk. The memo serves as a powerful prompt for investors to re-evaluate their positioning in light of the described environment.

Revisiting the Risk Posture#

Drawing from his memo Ruminating on Asset Allocation, Marks would argue that the first and most important step is to consciously decide on a desired risk posture-the balance between offense (seeking growth) and defense (preserving capital).⁵⁰ In a "frothy" environment with low prospective returns, a prudent adjustment would be to shift away from a maximally offensive stance toward a more balanced or defensive one.

Strategies and Asset Allocation#

• Countering Concentration: The most direct response to the risk of extreme market concentration is diversification. This means actively seeking opportunities outside the most crowded trades, such as in non-U.S. equities, small-cap stocks, or other sectors that have lagged.³ The memo implicitly critiques the "automated buying" of passive index funds, suggesting that in a top-heavy market, active security selection becomes more valuable to avoid overpaying for the largest names.¹⁴

• Asset Allocation Framework:

  • Equities: A potential adjustment involves reducing exposure to the most concentrated market segments (e.g., U.S. large-cap growth) while increasing allocations to defensive businesses and value-oriented sectors or geographic regions.

  • Credit: As argued in Gimme Credit, investors should consider increasing allocations to public and private credit. The dependable, contractual returns offered by credit may present a superior risk/reward proposition compared to equities in the current environment.³⁶

  • Alternatives & Risk Management: For those who remain heavily invested in equities, implementing disciplined risk management is paramount. This could involve using portfolio diversification, options strategies to hedge downside, or structured products that offer a degree of capital protection.³⁴ Allocations to assets with low correlation to equities, such as certain commodities or other alternatives, can also enhance portfolio resilience.⁵³

A Final Word on Prudence#

The ultimate lesson from Marks is behavioral. Success in a challenging environment requires a robust investment philosophy and the discipline to adhere to it.⁵⁴ This means resisting emotional decisions driven by greed or fear and focusing on what one can control: the process, the discipline, and the price paid for an asset.⁴¹ In a frothy market, as Marks advises, the best course of action may be to heed the adage: "Don't just do something; sit there".⁵⁶

VIII. Conclusion#

Howard Marks' 2025 memo, On Bubble Watch, is not a simple prediction of a market crash but a sophisticated framework for risk assessment in a complex and challenging environment. By defining a bubble as a "state of mind," Marks forces investors to look beyond price charts and diagnose the underlying psychology of the market. While he observes numerous cautionary signs-extreme concentration, elevated valuations, and a powerful narrative around AI-he also acknowledges compelling counterarguments, namely the exceptional quality of today's market leaders and the absence of the most extreme speculative psychology.

The memo's true value lies in its synthesis of history, psychology, and a disciplined, price-sensitive investment philosophy. Placed within the uncertain macroeconomic context of 2025, with its attendant tariff and interest rate risks, the memo serves as a powerful call for prudence. It suggests that the current environment, characterized by "lofty but not nutty" valuations, is one of high risk and low prospective returns for the broad market indices.

For investors, the implications are clear. This is not a time for complacency or for chasing momentum. It is a time to rigorously re-evaluate one's risk posture, to stress-test the assumptions embedded in portfolio allocations, and to appreciate the dangers of concentration. Whether through diversification, an increased allocation to the more dependable returns of credit, or the implementation of active risk management, the central message of On Bubble Watch is the timeless importance of controlling risk and adhering to a disciplined process, especially when the market's mood is overwhelmingly optimistic.

Works cited#

1. Howard Marks on Tech Bubbles: Why History Always Rhymes | Talks at GS 2022 - YouTube, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1ouQOVrTt8

2. How to Ride Market Cycles Perfectly | Howard Marks | Stocks | Investment - YouTube, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6BBW9UtQoo

3. Here's Howard Marks' Latest Warning : r/stocks - Reddit, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/1i36j61/heres_howard_marks_latest_warning/

4. On Bubble Watch - YouTube, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riyoadkNlco

5. Oaktree Clients From: Howard Marks Re: On Bubble Watch Exactly ..., accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.brookfieldoaktree.com/sites/default/files/2025-01/on-bubble-watch.pdf

6. On Bubble Watch - Oaktree Capital Management, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.oaktreecapital.com/insights/memo-podcast/on-bubble-watch

7. On Bubble Watch - Oaktree Capital Management, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.oaktreecapital.com/insights/memo/on-bubble-watch

8. Howard Marks' Alarming Stock Market Prediction - YouTube, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdwrvbiY_FI

9. On Bubble Watch | InsuranceAUM.com, accessed July 7, 2025, https://insuranceaum.com/on-bubble-watch

10. Transcript - Behind the Memo - Easy Money with Howard Marks and Edward Chancellor - Oaktree Capital Management, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.oaktreecapital.com/docs/default-source/memos/behind-the-memo---easy-money---transcript.pdf?sfvrsn=e32f5066_3

11. Howard Marks: Why History Always Rhymes In Markets | The Acquirer's Multiple®, accessed July 7, 2025, https://acquirersmultiple.com/2025/03/howard-marks-why-history-always-rhymes-in-markets/

12. Oaktree Capital Management - Advisor Perspectives, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.advisorperspectives.com/firm/oaktree-capital-management

13. Transcript - Behind the Memo - On Bubble Watch - Oaktree Capital Management, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.oaktreecapital.com/docs/default-source/memos/behind-the-memo---on-bubble-watch---transcript.pdf?sfvrsn=89c42b66_1

14. Podcast Review | On Bubble Watch - The Memo by Howard Marks, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.naos.com.au/blog/podcast-review-on-bubble-watch---the-memo-by-howard-marks

15. Howard Marks' 4 signs of the top (and other incredibly pertinent lessons for 2025), accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.livewiremarkets.com/wires/howard-marks-4-signs-of-the-top-and-other-incredibly-pertinent-lessons-for-2025

16. Howard Marks warns of stock market froth - Morningstar Australia, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com.au/personal-finance/howard-marks-warns-of-stock-market-froth

17. Howard Marks warns of market froth, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.angeladvisory.com.au/post/howard-marks-warns-of-market-froth

18. The Memo by Howard Marks - Apple Podcasts, accessed July 7, 2025, https://podcasts.apple.com/za/podcast/the-memo-by-howard-marks/id1521551570

19. Behind the Memo - On Bubble Watch - Oaktree Capital Management, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.oaktreecapital.com/insights/memo-podcast/behind-the-memo-on-bubble-watch

20. There is some froth, but not excessive! Howard Marks' 2025 year-start memo., accessed July 7, 2025, https://news.futunn.com/en/post/52039974/there-is-some-froth-but-not-excessive-howard-marks-2025

21. Sohra-Peak-Capital-Partners-Partnership-Letter-Q4-2024.pdf, accessed July 7, 2025, https://sohrapeakcapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Sohra-Peak-Capital-Partners-Partnership-Letter-Q4-2024.pdf

22. On Bubble Watch - Oaktree Capital Management - Commentaries ..., accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.advisorperspectives.com/commentaries/2025/01/11/on-bubble-watch

23. Howard Marks: On Bubble Watch - AdvisorAnalyst.com, accessed July 7, 2025, https://advisoranalyst.com/2025/01/10/howard-marks-on-bubble-watch.html/

24. A legendary investor who predicted the dot-com crash says there's a key ingredient missing for a market bubble, accessed July 7, 2025, https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/stock-market-bubble-ai-howard-marks-missing-ingredient-sentiment-2025-1

25. Oak Tree Capital's Marks: New things are prone to bubbles, currently private equity buying S&P 500, with a 10-year yield of only ±2%., accessed July 7, 2025, https://news.futunn.com/en/post/51962907/oak-tree-capital-s-marks-new-things-are-prone-to

26. Oak Tree Capital's Marks: New things are prone to bubbles, currently private equity buying S&P 500, with a 10-year yield of only ±2%. - Moomoo, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.moomoo.com/news/post/47900330/oak-tree-capital-s-marks-new-things-are-prone-to

27. Howard Marks: When Something Is On The Pedestal Of Popularity, Risk Of Decline Is High, accessed July 7, 2025, https://acquirersmultiple.com/2025/01/howard-marks-when-something-is-on-the-pedestal-of-popularity-risk-of-decline-is-high/

28. 2000-01-02-bubble.pdf - Oaktree Capital Management, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.oaktreecapital.com/docs/default-source/memos/2000-01-02-bubble.pdf

29. Is This a Bubble? - A Wealth of Common Sense, accessed July 7, 2025, https://awealthofcommonsense.com/2025/01/is-this-a-bubble/

30. Billionaire Investor Howard Marks Warns Against AI's 'Powerful' Novelty And FOMO As Nvidia, Other AI-Linked Stocks Tumble In 2025: Says This Enthusiasm 'Sometimes Leads To Bubbles' - Moomoo, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.moomoo.com/news/post/49892148/billionaire-investor-howard-marks-warns-against-ai-s-powerful-novelty

31. We're Not In 1999 Anymore, Toto - Memo to:, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.oaktreecapital.com/docs/default-source/memos/2000-12-31-were-not-in-1999-anymore.pdf?sfvrsn=3bbc0f65_2

32. Category: What I'm Reading - Benjamin Tseng, accessed July 7, 2025, https://benjamintseng.com/category/what-im-reading/

33. On Bubble Watch By Howard Marks 1/2/2025 : r/ValueInvesting - Reddit, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ValueInvesting/comments/1hw75hk/on_bubble_watch_by_howard_marks_122025/

34. S&P500 P/E ratios suggest investors are betting on decades more of skyhigh profits - Trivest Wealth Counsel, accessed July 7, 2025, https://advisor.wellington-altus.ca/trivestwealthcounsel/https-financialpost-com-investing-investors-betting-decades-more-skyhigh-profits/

35. What Howard Marks Misses : r/ValueInvesting - Reddit, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ValueInvesting/comments/1i4yyyv/what_howard_marks_misses/

36. The Memo by Howard Marks - Apple Podcasts, accessed July 7, 2025, https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-memo-by-howard-marks/id1521551570

37. Nobody Knows (Yet Again) - Oaktree Capital Management, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.oaktreecapital.com/insights/memo/nobody-knows-yet-again

38. Insights - Oaktree Capital Management, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.oaktreecapital.com/insights

39. What To Expect From Inflation In The Second Half Of 2025 - Investopedia, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/what-will-happen-with-inflation-in-the-second-half-of-2025-11760448

40. United States Economic Forecast Q2 2025 - Deloitte, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/economy/us-economic-forecast/united-states-outlook-analysis.html

41. Oaktree's Howard Marks Helps Investors Understand | The Motley Fool, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.fool.com/investing/2025/06/23/oaktrees-howard-marks-helps-investors-understand/

42. Conflicting signals cloud the outlook for 2025 interest rates - Credit Sesame, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.creditsesame.com/blog/mortgage/conflicting-signals-cloud-the-outlook-for-2025-interest-rates/

43. 2025 Mid-Year Market Outlook: 9 Key Questions To Frame Client Conversations, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.kitces.com/blog/mid-year-2025-market-outlook-investment-advisor-client-convesations-analysis-tariff-economic-impact-us-trade/

44. The Dual Mandate and the Primacy of Inflation Expectations - July 3, 2025 - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.atlantafed.org/news/speeches/2025/07/03/bostic-the-dual-mandate-and-the-primacy-of-inflation-expectations

45. How Much Will the Fed Cut Interest Rates? - Morningstar, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/markets/when-will-fed-start-cutting-interest-rates

46. Memo to: Oaktree Clients From: Howard Marks Re: Gimme Credit The questions I get from clients enable me to understand in real t, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.oaktreecapital.com/docs/default-source/memos/gimme-credit.pdf?sfvrsn=e7de2b66_4

47. Gimme Credit - Oaktree Capital Management, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.oaktreecapital.com/insights/memo/gimme-credit

48. Economic & Market Outlook - Annandale Capital, accessed July 7, 2025, https://annandalecap.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Annandale-Capital-Commentary-Q4-2024.pdf

49. On Bubble Watch: A Critical Look at Market Cycles for Asymmetric Investing and Trading, accessed July 7, 2025, https://shell-capital.com/asymmetric-investment-returns/on-bubble-watch-a-critical-look-at-market-cycles-and-asymmetric-trading

50. Ruminating on Asset Allocation - Oaktree Capital Management, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.oaktreecapital.com/insights/memo/ruminating-on-asset-allocation

51. Howard Marks: Investment Strategies for Consistently Outperforming the Market, accessed July 7, 2025, https://acquirersmultiple.com/2024/04/howard-marks-investment-strategies-for-consistently-outperforming-the-market/

52. Howard Marks of Oaktree and various other large institutional ..., accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/investing/comments/1j5xwu4/howard_marks_of_oaktree_and_various_other_large/

53. Back into the mosh pit: Commodity investing in 2025 | Aberdeen, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.aberdeeninvestments.com/en-us/investor/insights-and-research/back-into-the-mosh-pit-commodity-investing-in-2025

54. Top 8 Investment Tips from Howard Marks | Edelweiss MF, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.edelweissmf.com/investor-insights/mutual-fund-investment-tips-and-articles/8-investing-insights-from-howard-marks

55. Howard Marks of Oaktree Capital shares his investment philosophy with FLAME students at a value investing knowledge series, accessed July 7, 2025, https://www.flame.edu.in/happenings/howard-marks-of-oaktree-capital-shares-his-investment-philosophy-with-flame-students-at-a-value-investing-knowledge-series

56. Howard Marks: The 'Sitting On Your Hands' Investing Strategy | The Acquirer's Multiple®, accessed July 7, 2025, https://acquirersmultiple.com/2024/09/howard-marks-the-sitting-on-your-hands-investing-strategy/