American Depositary Receipts: A Comprehensive Guide to Global Investing with Case Studies on BABA, DIDIY, and TCEHY

1. Understanding American Depositary Receipts (ADRs): A Gateway to Global Investing#

Defining ADRs: What They Are and Their Core Purpose#

American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) are negotiable securities that represent ownership in the shares of a non-U.S. company, facilitating the trading of these foreign shares within the U.S. financial markets.¹ These instruments are denominated in U.S. dollars, pay dividends in U.S. dollars, and can be bought and sold like ordinary shares of U.S. companies during domestic trading hours.¹ The fundamental aim of ADRs is to simplify the process for U.S. investors to invest in foreign securities. This is achieved by having U.S. depositary banks manage critical aspects such as share custody, currency conversion for dividends, and the complexities of local tax issues, thereby mitigating many of the risks and inconveniences typically associated with cross-border and cross-currency transactions.¹

The concept of ADRs is not new; the first such instrument was introduced by J.P. Morgan in 1927 for the British retailer Selfridges, underscoring a long-standing market need for vehicles that bridge international investment gaps.¹ ADRs are effectively the U.S. counterpart to Global Depositary Receipts (GDRs).¹ A key distinction is that ADRs are exclusively traded in U.S. markets and are issued by U.S.-based banks. In contrast, GDRs can be traded in multiple international markets (though they cannot be used to raise capital in the U.S.) and are issued by international depositary banks.³

The advent and persistence of ADRs signify more than mere investor convenience; they represent a crucial element in the broader trend of globalization of capital markets. By creating a standardized, U.S.-dollar-denominated instrument representing foreign shares, ADRs effectively lower the operational and regulatory hurdles that can otherwise impede international investment.¹ This standardization bridges disparate market structures and regulations, fostering greater integration of global capital flows. The nearly century-long existence of ADRs points to a continuous and robust demand for such cross-border investment mechanisms.¹

Furthermore, the denomination of ADRs in U.S. dollars and the payment of dividends in the same currency offer a significant psychological and practical anchor for U.S. investors.¹ Direct investment in foreign equities often involves navigating the complexities of foreign currency exchange rates and associated conversion costs.⁴ ADRs simplify this by having the depositary bank handle the initial currency conversion.¹ This makes the investment feel more akin to a domestic transaction, potentially increasing an investor's comfort level and willingness to allocate capital to foreign enterprises. This aspect of standardization is a cornerstone of the value proposition offered by ADRs.

The Rationale: Why Companies Issue ADRs and Why Investors Use Them#

Foreign companies opt to establish ADR programs for several strategic reasons. A primary driver is to access a broader investor base and tap into the deep and liquid U.S. capital markets.⁶ Notably, Level III ADR programs specifically allow companies to raise new capital directly from U.S. investors.⁶ Beyond capital raising, issuing ADRs can significantly enhance a company's public profile and visibility within the influential U.S. market.³ Moreover, the commitment to an ADR program, especially a sponsored one with higher listing requirements, can signal enhanced corporate governance standards to global investors and clients, which is particularly valuable for firms from markets with differing governance norms.¹

For U.S. investors, ADRs offer a straightforward means to gain exposure to non-U.S. equities without the complexities of trading on foreign local exchanges or dealing directly with foreign currencies.² They can conveniently trade these instruments during U.S. market hours using their existing U.S. brokerage accounts.² A significant advantage, particularly with exchange-listed ADRs (Level II and III), is the potential for increased transparency. These ADRs require the foreign company to comply with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reporting requirements, often including financial statements prepared according to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).²

The decision by a foreign company to establish an ADR program, particularly a sponsored Level II or Level III program, is a strategic commitment to U.S. market engagement and regulatory compliance, extending beyond a mere technical listing. The process involves navigating significant regulatory hurdles, such as SEC registration (e.g., Forms F-6, 20-F, F-1), adherence to U.S. GAAP or IFRS, and potentially compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.⁶ Companies undertake these substantial costs and efforts not only for potential capital access but also to build credibility and a long-term presence in the world's largest and most liquid capital market. This indicates a much higher level of commitment compared to establishing an unsponsored or Level I ADR.

However, for U.S. investors, the information provided through ADRs can present a dual-edged scenario. While higher-level ADRs mandate SEC-compliant disclosures, offering a degree of standardized financial information ², the underlying company's operations remain rooted in a foreign regulatory and economic environment. The nuances of local market dynamics, specific geopolitical risks inherent to the company's home country ⁴, and prevailing cultural factors may not be fully captured or easily discernible to a U.S. investor solely through U.S.-formatted reports. Thus, while ADRs significantly improve information access, they do not obviate the need for thorough due diligence concerning the foreign operational context.

2. The Mechanics of ADRs: From Foreign Shares to U.S. Tradable Securities#

The Creation Process: How Foreign Shares Become ADRs#

The transformation of foreign shares into U.S.-tradable ADRs involves a structured process facilitated by U.S. financial institutions. Initially, a U.S. depositary bank, such as BNY Mellon, Citibank, or J.P. Morgan, purchases shares of a foreign company directly on that company's local stock exchange.² These acquired shares are then deposited and held in custody by a local custodian bank situated in the foreign company's home country. This custodian bank acts on behalf of the U.S. depositary bank, ensuring the physical shares are securely held.⁵

Following the deposit of these foreign shares (which are often referred to as American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, once designated for an ADR program), the U.S. depositary bank issues ADRs. These ADRs are certificates that represent ownership of the deposited ADSs.¹ An important feature of ADRs is their flexibility in representation: a single ADR can represent a fraction of a foreign share, one whole share, or multiple shares of the foreign security. This ADR ratio is determined by the depositary bank with the aim of pricing the ADR at a level that is attractive and accessible to U.S. investors, often aligning with typical U.S. stock price ranges.¹ For instance, Alibaba's (BABA) ADR has a ratio where one ADR represents eight ordinary shares.¹⁰

The creation of ADRs relies on a complex chain of custody and interbank relationships that span international borders, underscoring the sophisticated infrastructure that underpins modern global finance. This process involves at least two primary banking institutions (the U.S. depositary bank and the foreign custodian bank) and operations across at least two distinct markets (the foreign company's local market and the U.S. market).² The integrity of this chain, maintained through robust legal agreements, secure custody arrangements, and efficient communication systems, is paramount for ensuring investor confidence in the ADRs and their direct backing by actual foreign shares.

The ADR ratio is a critical, though sometimes underappreciated, element that directly influences an ADR's trading price and its perceived affordability for U.S. investors. This ratio can also be adjusted by the depositary bank over time. An ADR representing multiple underlying shares will naturally trade at a higher price than one representing a single share, assuming the price of the underlying foreign share remains constant.⁹ Depositary banks strategically set this ratio to make the ADR's price point "appealing" ⁸, often targeting a two-digit U.S. dollar value common for many U.S. stocks. A notable example is the change in Alibaba's ADR ratio in 2019 from 1:1 to 8:1.¹¹ Such a change can significantly alter the ADR's market price without any corresponding change in the underlying company's intrinsic value, potentially leading to confusion among investors if not clearly communicated and understood. This also means that any direct price comparison between an ADR and its corresponding foreign ordinary share requires careful adjustment for this ratio.

The Role of Depositary Banks: Custodians and Facilitators#

Depositary banks are central to the functioning of the ADR market. Prominent institutions in this space include BNY Mellon, Citibank, J.P. Morgan, and Deutsche Bank.⁵ Their responsibilities are multifaceted: they manage the issuance and cancellation of ADRs, ensuring that the number of ADRs in circulation corresponds to the underlying shares held in custody.⁵ A key function is the handling of dividend payments; these banks collect dividends paid by the foreign company in its local currency, convert these funds into U.S. dollars, and then distribute the U.S. dollar dividends to the ADR holders.¹

Furthermore, for sponsored ADRs, depositary banks manage shareholder communications, which can include distributing company reports, processing proxy voting instructions from ADR holders, and notifying them of corporate actions such as rights offerings or stock splits.⁹ For providing these extensive services, depositary banks charge various fees. These can include custody fees (often termed Depository Service Fees or pass-through fees), currency conversion fees, and dividend processing fees. These charges are typically deducted from dividend payments or may be passed on to investors through their brokers.⁵ Interestingly, depositary banks may offer their ADR issuing services to foreign companies at no direct cost, planning to recoup their expenses and generate profit through the fees levied on ADR investors.⁵

Depositary banks function as critical intermediaries and, in a sense, market makers for international equity flows into the U.S. Their role is far from passive; they actively create and manage ADR programs ⁵, establish ADR ratios ⁸, and navigate complex operational processes like dividend conversion and tax withholding protocols.¹ Importantly, they generate revenue through the various fees charged to investors.⁵ In certain scenarios, particularly with unsponsored ADRs, these banks may also derive revenue from the spread on foreign exchange conversions.¹⁴ This positions them as active participants who shape the accessibility and overall cost structure of investing in foreign companies via ADRs.

While ADRs provide convenient access to global markets, the associated fee structure can create a subtle but persistent drag on investor returns. ADRs typically come with several types of fees: custody or depository service fees ⁸, currency conversion fees ⁴, and potentially other administrative charges. Although these fees might appear small on a per-share basis (for example, pass-through fees are often cited in the range of 1 to 3 cents per share ¹³), they accumulate over time and can reduce the net return realized by the investor. This is especially true for long-term holdings or for ADRs that make frequent dividend payments. These costs represent the direct price paid for the convenience, risk mitigation, and administrative services that ADRs provide.

Trading ADRs: Exchanges, OTC Markets, and Liquidity#

ADRs are traded in the U.S. financial markets through two main types of venues. Level II and Level III ADRs, which meet higher regulatory and disclosure standards, are typically eligible for listing and trading on national U.S. stock exchanges such as the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the NASDAQ Stock Market.² In contrast, Level I ADRs and all unsponsored ADRs are generally traded in the over-the-counter (OTC) market.¹ Regardless of the trading venue, ADRs are bought, sold, and settled in U.S. dollars, adhering to standard U.S. market conventions and trading hours.²

The liquidity of ADRs can vary significantly. As a general rule, ADRs listed on major exchanges tend to be more liquid than those traded on the OTC market.⁴ However, it is also possible that the liquidity of an ADR in the U.S. market might be lower than that of the underlying shares in their home market, particularly if the primary trading activity for that company's stock remains concentrated on its local exchange.¹³ The price of an ADR is designed to closely track the price of the underlying foreign security in its home market, after adjusting for the ADR ratio and prevailing currency exchange rates.¹

The trading venue for an ADR serves as a strong indicator of its regulatory scrutiny, the likely extent of information availability, and the typical investor base it attracts. Exchange-listed ADRs, being Level II or Level III programs, necessitate compliance with SEC regulations and adherence to the stringent listing standards of the exchange.⁶ This implies a greater degree of transparency and tends to attract a wider spectrum of investors, including large institutional players. Conversely, OTC-traded ADRs, which are usually Level I or unsponsored programs, operate under minimal SEC reporting requirements.⁸ This can lead to comparatively less liquidity, wider bid-ask spreads between buying and selling prices ¹³, and may attract a more speculative or niche investor segment. This clear segmentation in trading venues is a direct consequence of the tiered regulatory framework governing ADRs.

While the prices of ADRs are intended to mirror those of their underlying shares, arbitrage opportunities can theoretically arise, but they are often limited in practice. Discrepancies can occur due to differences in market trading hours, the timing of news flow affecting the company, or temporary imbalances in supply and demand for the ADR versus the foreign share. Arbitrageurs could potentially profit from such deviations by simultaneously buying the relatively cheaper instrument and selling the more expensive one (e.g., buying ordinary shares in the foreign market, converting them into ADRs, and selling the ADRs in the U.S., or the reverse). However, the practical execution of such strategies is often constrained by transaction costs, including ADR creation or cancellation fees ¹³, currency conversion costs, and potential delays in the conversion process. These factors can erode or eliminate potential arbitrage profits unless the price discrepancies are substantial and persistent.

3. Navigating the Landscape of ADRs: Levels and Sponsorship#

Sponsored vs. Unsponsored ADRs: Company Involvement and Implications#

A fundamental distinction in the ADR market is between sponsored and unsponsored programs, differentiated primarily by the level of involvement of the foreign company whose shares are represented.

Sponsored ADRs are established when a foreign company enters into a formal agreement with a single U.S. depositary bank.¹ In this arrangement, the foreign company actively participates in the ADR program, often bearing some or all of the costs associated with its establishment and maintenance.⁶ This collaboration ensures that the depositary bank acts as the company's designated agent for the ADRs, handling tasks like dividend distribution and shareholder communications. Sponsored ADRs can be categorized as Level I, Level II, or Level III, and if they meet the requirements of Level II or III, they can be listed on major U.S. stock exchanges.⁷

Unsponsored ADRs, conversely, are created without the formal participation, approval, or cooperation of the foreign company.³ These programs are typically initiated by one or more U.S. depositary banks or broker-dealers in response to perceived U.S. investor demand for a particular foreign stock.¹ Because the foreign company is not directly involved, it does not pay any fees for the ADR program, and information flow to ADR holders may be limited to what is publicly available in the company's home market. Unsponsored ADRs trade exclusively in the OTC market and generally do not confer voting rights to the ADR holders.³ It's possible for multiple unsponsored ADRs representing the same underlying foreign share to co-exist, each issued by a different depositary bank.¹

The existence of unsponsored ADRs highlights a market-driven demand for access to certain foreign stocks, even when the foreign company itself is not actively seeking a U.S. listing. This mechanism allows U.S. investors to trade shares of foreign companies that might otherwise be inaccessible. However, this reactive approach can sometimes lead to a fragmented market, with several unsponsored ADRs for the same company being managed by different depositaries.¹ This can create inconsistencies in fee structures or service levels. For investors, this means access is available, but potentially with a trade-off in terms of the quality of information, level of company engagement, and support from a single, dedicated depositary.

In contrast, a foreign company's decision to sponsor an ADR program, particularly at the higher Levels II or III, reflects a proactive investor relations strategy specifically targeting the U.S. market. Sponsorship involves a formal legal agreement and often entails the foreign company sharing or covering the costs of the program.⁶ This active involvement signals that the company values its U.S. investors and is willing to invest resources in facilitating their access to its shares and providing them with comprehensive information. This proactive stance generally leads to better investor relations, potentially a more stable and liquid ADR, and a closer alignment of interests between the company and its U.S. ADR holders, as opposed to the passive role of the company in unsponsored programs.

ADR Levels Demystified#

ADRs are structured into three primary levels, each reflecting a different degree of U.S. market access, SEC reporting requirements, and capabilities for the foreign company.

• Level I ADRs: > This is the most basic type of ADR program. Level I ADRs can be either sponsored or unsponsored.1 They are traded exclusively on the OTC market and cannot be used by the foreign company to raise capital in the U.S..1 The SEC reporting requirements are minimal; companies are generally exempt from the full reporting obligations imposed on U.S. public companies or higher-level ADR issuers. A Form F-6 must be filed with the SEC to register the ADRs themselves, but this form pertains to the deposit agreement and not extensive company-specific disclosures.6 The primary function of a Level I ADR is often to establish an initial trading presence in the U.S. and increase the company's public profile.3 Due to the limited disclosure and OTC trading, these ADRs can sometimes be less liquid and may be considered more speculative by investors.3 For foreign companies, Level I programs offer the simplest and least burdensome route to having their securities traded in the U.S., but for investors, they provide the least transparency and regulatory oversight among the ADR types.

• Level II ADRs: > These programs represent a significant step up in terms of U.S. market integration. Level II ADRs must be sponsored and can be listed on a major U.S. stock exchange, such as the NYSE or NASDAQ.1 This requires the foreign company to register with the SEC by filing a Form 20-F (an annual report similar to the Form 10-K filed by U.S. companies) and to comply with the accounting standards of either U.S. GAAP or IFRS.2 Companies with Level II ADRs are also typically subject to the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. While Level II ADRs provide greater visibility and access to a broader investor base through exchange listing, they cannot be used to issue new shares to raise capital in the U.S..3 This level signifies a substantial commitment by the foreign company to transparency and U.S. regulatory standards.

• Level III ADRs: > This is the highest and most prestigious tier of ADR programs. Level III ADRs are also sponsored and listed on a major U.S. stock exchange. Crucially, unlike Level I and II, Level III programs allow the foreign company to issue new shares and raise capital directly from U.S. investors through a public offering.6 This requires the company to file a Form F-1 (a registration statement for a public offering) with the SEC, in addition to the annual Form 20-F and other ongoing disclosure obligations similar to those for U.S. public companies.6 Level III ADRs are generally regarded as the most reputable type, as they demand the highest level of SEC compliance and disclosure.3 This full integration into the U.S. capital markets makes them attractive to a wide range of investors and signifies a strong commitment by the foreign company to the U.S. market.

The tiered structure of ADR levels provides a graduated pathway for foreign companies to enter and progressively deepen their engagement with U.S. capital markets. A company might initiate its U.S. presence with a Level I ADR to gauge investor interest and establish a basic trading footprint with minimal regulatory burden.¹ If this proves successful and aligns with the company's broader strategy, it can then "upgrade" to a Level II program to gain an exchange listing and enhanced visibility.¹ Should the company later decide to raise capital in the U.S., it can further transition to a Level III program.⁶ This progression reflects a careful strategic decision-making process by the foreign company, balancing the significant benefits of U.S. market access against the increasing costs and obligations associated with higher levels of regulatory compliance.

The SEC reporting requirements associated with Level II and Level III ADRs, such as the Form 20-F and adherence to U.S. GAAP or IFRS, serve as a vital mechanism for investor protection and maintaining market integrity. These regulations attempt to level the informational playing field between domestic U.S. issuers and foreign companies accessing U.S. markets.² By mandating disclosures comparable to those of U.S. companies, the SEC aims to ensure that U.S. investors have access to reliable, consistent, and standardized information. This reduces information asymmetry and fosters greater confidence in trading these foreign securities. This regulatory oversight is a key feature that distinguishes Level II and III ADRs from the less regulated Level I or unsponsored ADRs.

Restricted ADR Programs (Brief Overview)#

Beyond the publicly traded levels, ADRs can also be structured as restricted programs. These are designed for foreign companies that wish to limit the trading of their securities to specific categories of investors. The two main types are established under SEC Rule 144A and Regulation S.¹

• Rule 144A ADRs: These are issued via a private placement and can only be sold to or traded by Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs), which are large, sophisticated institutional investors. Rule 144A ADRs represent restricted stock and are generally not available to public retail shareholders in the U.S..¹

• Regulation S ADRs: These are issued to offshore, non-U.S. residents and are not registered with U.S. securities authorities for trading by U.S. persons during a restricted period.¹

Restricted ADR programs, particularly those under Rule 144A, account for a notable portion of all issued ADRs, approximately 30% according to one source.¹ This indicates a sophisticated institutional market for foreign securities that operates with less public visibility but handles significant investment volumes. Rule 144A allows foreign companies to access U.S. institutional capital without undergoing the full rigors and expense of a public SEC registration.¹ The substantial use of these programs points to strong demand from QIBs for such tailored instruments, facilitating large-scale international investment flows efficiently among sophisticated market participants who are deemed capable of assessing risks with less extensive public disclosure.

Table 1: Comparison of ADR Program Levels#

To provide a clear overview, the following table compares the key features of different ADR program types and levels:

This table synthesizes information from multiple sources including.¹

4. Weighing the Options: Advantages and Disadvantages of ADR Investing#

Benefits for the U.S. Investor#

Investing in foreign companies through ADRs offers several compelling advantages for U.S.-based investors:

• Access to Foreign Markets and Diversification: ADRs provide a simple gateway to invest in international companies without the need to directly navigate foreign stock exchanges, deal with foreign currencies, or open overseas brokerage accounts.² This allows investors to diversify their portfolios geographically and across a wider range of global industries.⁴

• Convenience and Liquidity: ADRs trade on U.S. exchanges or the OTC market, just like domestic stocks. They are quoted in U.S. dollars and can be bought and sold through existing U.S. brokerage accounts during regular U.S. trading hours.² Exchange-listed ADRs, in particular, often offer good liquidity, making it easier for investors to enter and exit positions.⁴

• Transparency (for listed ADRs): ADRs listed on U.S. exchanges (Level II and III) are subject to SEC reporting requirements. This includes filing quarterly or semi-annual results and annual reports (Form 20-F) that often conform to U.S. GAAP or IFRS accounting standards.² This can provide investors with a higher level of transparency and more readily available information than if they were to invest directly in some overseas markets.²

• Dividend Handling: The U.S. depositary bank responsible for the ADR program collects any dividends paid by the foreign company, converts them from the foreign currency into U.S. dollars, and distributes them to ADR holders, simplifying the process for the investor.²

• Margin and Options Trading: Some exchange-listed ADRs are eligible for margin trading, and listed options contracts may also be available for certain ADRs, providing investors with additional trading and hedging strategies.²

The "convenience" offered by ADRs plays a crucial role in lowering the friction costs-both monetary and cognitive-for U.S. investors venturing into international markets. Direct overseas investment can be daunting, involving unfamiliar brokerage systems, different market hours, currency conversion complexities, and potentially challenging tax implications.² ADRs abstract away most of these complexities.² By making foreign investing "feel" much like domestic investing (i.e., transacting in U.S. dollars, through a U.S. broker, during U.S. market hours), ADRs reduce the perceived effort and risk. This, in turn, can encourage broader participation from U.S. investors in global growth opportunities, leading to a more efficient allocation of capital worldwide.

Potential Risks and Drawbacks to Consider#

Despite their advantages, ADRs also come with several risks and drawbacks that investors must carefully consider:

• Currency Risk: The value of an ADR is directly exposed to fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the foreign company's local currency.⁴ Even if the underlying foreign stock performs well in its local market, a strengthening U.S. dollar (or weakening foreign currency) can reduce the U.S. dollar value of the ADR and its dividends, negatively impacting returns for the U.S. investor.

• Market Risk: Investing in ADRs exposes investors to the specific risks associated with the foreign company and its local market. These can include economic downturns, political instability, changes in local regulations, or sector-specific issues in the foreign country.⁴

• Fees: ADRs often entail higher fees compared to investing in domestic U.S. companies. These can include depositary service fees (also known as custody or pass-through fees) charged by the bank for administering the ADR program, as well as fees for currency conversion when dividends are paid.⁴ These fees are typically passed on to the ADR holder.¹³

• Limited Availability: Not all foreign companies have ADR programs, particularly smaller or less internationally focused firms. This means that the universe of foreign stocks accessible via ADRs, while broad, is not exhaustive.⁴

• Dividend Issues: Net dividend payouts from ADRs can sometimes be lower than those from holding the ordinary shares directly. This is often due to withholding taxes imposed by the foreign company's home country on dividends paid to foreign investors.⁴ While tax treaties may reduce the impact of double taxation, the process can be complex, and the depositary bank may also charge fees for processing dividends.⁵

• Voting Rights: Holders of ADRs may have limited or no voting rights in the foreign company's shareholder meetings. This is particularly common with unsponsored ADRs and some Level I programs.³ In sponsored programs, the depositary bank typically arranges for voting instructions to be passed on, but the process can be less direct than for ordinary shareholders.

• Regulatory and Accounting Differences: While Level II and III ADRs require SEC filings, the foreign company still operates under the regulatory framework and business practices of its home country. Differences in accounting standards (even with IFRS or GAAP reconciliation), corporate governance norms, and legal environments can make it more challenging for U.S. investors to fully evaluate the investment.⁴

• Liquidity Risk (for some ADRs): While many ADRs are liquid, some, especially those traded on the OTC market or representing smaller companies, may suffer from low trading volumes. This can lead to wider bid-ask spreads, increased price volatility, and difficulty in executing trades at desired prices.⁴

• Delisting or Termination Risk: ADR programs can be terminated by the foreign company or the depositary bank. If an ADR program is terminated, or if an ADR is delisted from an exchange, investors may be forced to sell their ADRs, convert them into the underlying foreign shares (which can be a complex and costly process, and may not always be feasible to hold in a U.S. brokerage account ¹³), or risk holding an illiquid or untradable security.¹ The delisting of Didi Global from the NYSE serves as a prominent recent example of this risk.¹⁶

The layer of intermediation provided by the depositary bank, while offering benefits like simplified access and currency conversion, also introduces its own set of fees and the potential for misaligned incentives. Depositary banks are for-profit entities.⁵ While they facilitate access to foreign markets, they also extract value through various fees.⁴ For instance, in the case of some unsponsored ADRs, the depositary bank may earn revenue from the foreign exchange spreads on currency conversions.¹⁴ This means their incentive might be more aligned with maximizing trading volume or FX conversion revenue rather than solely with the long-term interests of the foreign company or the ADR holders. This intermediation, essential for the ADR structure to function, is therefore not without its costs or potential conflicts.

Furthermore, political and regulatory risks emanating from the foreign company's home country can have swift and severe repercussions for ADRs, potentially overriding the protections or transparency offered by U.S. listing requirements. The case of Didi Global is a stark illustration of this vulnerability.¹⁶ Didi was a NYSE-listed ADR, implying it met Level II or III disclosure standards.¹⁶ However, regulatory actions by Chinese authorities, particularly concerning data security, led to its forced delisting from the NYSE shortly after its IPO.¹⁶ This event powerfully demonstrates that compliance with U.S. SEC regulations does not insulate an ADR from the sovereign risks of its home country. Investors in ADRs, especially those representing companies from nations with significant state influence over business activities, must diligently assess not only the company's fundamentals but also the broader geopolitical and regulatory landscape of the issuer's domicile.

Key Financial Considerations: Fees, Taxes, and Currency Exposure#

Investors in ADRs must be acutely aware of several financial factors that can impact their overall returns:

• Fees: As mentioned, ADRs come with various fees. "Pass-through fees" or "custody fees" are commonly charged by depositary banks to cover administrative services such as inventorying the foreign shares, registration, compliance, dividend payment processing, and shareholder communications.⁸ These fees typically range from $0.01 to $0.05 per share annually and can be deducted from dividends paid to ADR holders or, if the company does not pay a dividend, charged to the investor's brokerage account.⁸ Additionally, fees for converting dividend payments from the foreign currency to U.S. dollars are standard.⁴

• Taxes: ADR investments can be subject to taxes in both the United States (on dividends and capital gains) and potentially in the home country of the foreign company.⁴ Many countries impose withholding taxes on dividends paid to foreign investors. While bilateral tax treaties between the U.S. and other countries often aim to reduce or eliminate double taxation (e.g., by allowing U.S. investors to claim a foreign tax credit), navigating these rules can be complex, and some tax leakage may still occur.

• Currency Exposure: This is an inherent risk in ADR investing. The market value of the ADR and the U.S. dollar amount of any dividends received are directly affected by the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the currency in which the underlying shares and original dividends are denominated.⁴ A strengthening U.S. dollar against the foreign currency will reduce the U.S. dollar value of the investment and its income, while a weakening U.S. dollar will have the opposite effect.

The cumulative effect of these fees and any foreign taxes withheld can significantly erode the "alpha" or excess return an investor might be seeking from international diversification through ADRs. Investors often look to international markets to achieve higher returns than available domestically or to benefit from lower correlations with their home market. ADRs provide a convenient vehicle for this. However, the various layers of fees (custody, conversion ⁴) and potential tax leakage (foreign withholding taxes ⁴) act as direct deductions from any gross returns generated by the underlying foreign shares. It is crucial for investors to factor these ongoing costs into their expected net returns to make well-informed investment decisions.

Understanding the ADR ratio is critical not just for accurate price comparison but also for correctly assessing per-share financial metrics like dividends and earnings attributable to the ADR holder. For example, if an ADR represents multiple ordinary shares (e.g., Alibaba's BABA ADR, where 1 ADR equals 8 ordinary shares ¹⁰), then the dividend per ADR will be eight times the dividend per ordinary share (before fees and taxes are applied to the ADR). Similarly, earnings per ADR would be eight times the earnings per ordinary share. Failing to account for this ratio ¹ can lead to significant misinterpretations of an ADR's yield, its valuation multiples (like the P/E ratio), and its overall financial attractiveness.

5. ADRs in Focus: Case Studies of Prominent Chinese Companies#

To illustrate the concepts discussed, this section examines the ADRs of three prominent Chinese companies: Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. (BABA), Didi Global Inc. (DIDIY), and Tencent Holdings Ltd. (TCEHY). These examples showcase different ADR structures, trading characteristics, and experiences within the U.S. market.

Table 2: Summary of Case Study ADRs (BABA, DIDIY, TCEHY)#

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. (BABA): A NYSE-Listed ADR#

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. is a multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Its ADR is one of the most widely recognized and actively traded foreign securities in the U.S.

• ADR Structure: Alibaba's ADRs trade on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the ticker symbol BABA.¹⁸ It is a sponsored ADR program, with Citibank serving as the depositary bank.¹¹ Given its listing on the NYSE and its ability to raise capital in the U.S. (evidenced by its large initial public offering and subsequent SEC filings such as Form S-8 for employee share plans ²²), BABA's ADR program is classified as Level III. This is further confirmed by its regular filing of Form 20-F, the annual report required for foreign private issuers with Level II or III ADRs.²⁴

• ADR Ratio: Each BABA ADR represents eight ordinary shares of Alibaba Group Holding Ltd..¹¹ This ratio was changed from an earlier 1:1 ratio, effective July 30, 2019.¹¹

• Trading and Performance: BABA ADRs are actively traded on the NYSE with substantial daily volume.¹⁸ Their performance is closely watched by global investors and is often influenced by broader market sentiment towards Chinese technology stocks, developments in U.S.-China trade and political relations, and Chinese regulatory actions.

• SEC Filings: As a Level III ADR issuer, Alibaba regularly files reports with the SEC, including Form 6-K (to disclose material information made public in its home market) and the comprehensive Form 20-F annual report.²²

BABA's status as a Level III ADR listed on the NYSE signifies its deep integration into the U.S. capital markets. This makes it a bellwether for U.S. investor sentiment towards large-cap Chinese technology companies. Its high level of SEC disclosure and adherence to U.S. market standards make it accessible and relatively trusted by a wide range of U.S. investors. Consequently, the ADR's performance often reflects broader U.S. perspectives on the Chinese tech sector, geopolitical dynamics, and shifts in Chinese regulatory policy. The adjustment of its ADR ratio in 2019 ¹¹ also points to active management of its ADR program, likely to ensure the ADR price remains attractive and convenient for U.S. investors.

The requirement for Alibaba to file Form 20-F ²⁴ provides U.S. investors with a standardized financial reporting framework, typically conforming to U.S. GAAP or IFRS. This is crucial for enabling comparative analysis with other U.S.-listed companies. However, it is important for investors to understand that many Chinese tech companies listed in the U.S., including Alibaba, utilize Variable Interest Entity (VIE) structures. These structures are employed to navigate Chinese regulations that restrict foreign ownership in certain sensitive sectors. While these VIE structures are disclosed in the Form 20-F, their complexities and the associated risks (such as regulatory uncertainty in China regarding their long-term legitimacy) represent a critical layer of due diligence that extends beyond standard financial statement analysis. This is a unique risk factor characteristic of many Chinese ADRs.

Didi Global Inc. (DIDIY): Navigating Delisting and the OTC Market#

Didi Global Inc. is a major Chinese mobility technology platform. Its experience in the U.S. ADR market has been notably turbulent, offering important lessons about regulatory risks.

• Original ADR (DIDI): Didi launched its initial public offering (IPO) on the NYSE in June 2021 under the ticker symbol DIDI.²⁸ At the time of its IPO, four ADSs represented one Class A ordinary share of the company.²³ Citibank was the depositary for this NYSE-listed ADR ²⁵, and prominent investment banks like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and J.P. Morgan acted as joint bookrunners for the offering.²⁸

• Delisting: Shortly after its U.S. IPO, Didi faced intense regulatory scrutiny from Chinese authorities, primarily concerning data security and cybersecurity practices.¹⁷ This pressure culminated in the company announcing its intention to delist its ADSs from the NYSE in May 2022, with the delisting becoming effective around June 2022.¹⁶

• Current ADR (DIDIY): Following its delisting from the NYSE, Didi's ADSs began trading on the U.S. over-the-counter (OTC) market, specifically on the OTC Pink marketplace, under the new ticker symbol DIDIY.¹⁷ The ADR ratio remains the same, with four ADSs representing one Class A ordinary share.²³

• ADR Program Level/Sponsorship (DIDIY): After delisting from a major exchange and moving to the OTC Pink market, DIDIY is likely operating as an unsponsored ADR or, at best, a downgraded Level I sponsored ADR. The OTC Pink market is known for its minimal disclosure requirements. Sources indicate that unsponsored ADRs and Level I sponsored ADRs trade on the OTC market with limited disclosure.⁷ While Citibank was the depositary for the original NYSE-listed DIDI ADR ²⁵, its current role for the OTC-traded DIDIY is less clear, which is often characteristic of unsponsored programs where multiple depositaries might be involved or where the company has no formal relationship with any single depositary.

• Regulatory Challenges: The core reason for Didi's delisting was a cybersecurity probe initiated by the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC). The company stated it would be unable to complete this review and resume normal business operations while remaining listed on the NYSE.¹⁷ Additionally, Didi was identified by the SEC among companies that had used non-compliant auditors for their fiscal year 2021 financial statements, although the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) later announced it had secured access to inspect Chinese audit firms.¹⁷

Didi's rapid and forced delisting from the NYSE serves as a potent case study highlighting sovereign risk and the potential precariousness of some foreign ADRs, particularly when the national security or critical data concerns of the company's home government become paramount. Didi's IPO was initially successful ²⁸, but almost immediately, Chinese regulatory actions ¹⁷ compelled its delisting from a major U.S. exchange.¹⁶ This sequence of events starkly demonstrates that even with compliance with SEC listing requirements for a U.S. exchange, the home country's government can exert overriding influence, leading to significant adverse impacts on U.S. investors. This underscores the reality that ADRs are not insulated from the political and regulatory environment of the issuer's domicile.

The transition from a NYSE-listed ADR (DIDI) to an OTC-traded ADR (DIDIY) has likely resulted in reduced liquidity, diminished investor transparency, and a shift in the investor profile for Didi's U.S. securities. A NYSE listing typically provides high visibility, mandates stringent reporting standards, and attracts a broad range of institutional investors.⁷ Delisting to the OTC Pink market ¹⁷ generally implies less stringent reporting obligations, potentially lower trading volumes ⁴, wider bid-ask spreads between buy and sell prices, and a tendency to attract more retail or speculative investors. This change fundamentally alters the investment characteristics of Didi's U.S.-tradable shares. Didi itself has indicated that it might seek to relist on another stock exchange, such as in Hong Kong, once the CAC review is concluded ¹⁷, suggesting that the current OTC status is not considered ideal by the company.

Tencent Holdings Ltd. (TCEHY): Accessing a Tech Giant via OTC ADRs#

Tencent Holdings Ltd. is a global technology conglomerate with extensive operations in social media, gaming, digital payments, and cloud computing. Despite its massive scale, its primary access for U.S. investors is through an OTC-traded ADR.

• ADR Structure: Tencent's ADRs trade on the OTC market, specifically the OTC Pink marketplace, under the ticker symbol TCEHY.²⁰

• ADR Ratio: Each TCEHY ADR represents one ordinary share of Tencent Holdings Ltd., a 1:1 ratio.²¹

• Sponsorship and Depositary: The TCEHY ADR program is unsponsored. This is indicated by the involvement of multiple depositary banks, including J.P. Morgan, BNY Mellon, Citibank, and Deutsche Bank, which is a common characteristic of unsponsored programs where no single bank has an exclusive agreement with the foreign company.¹ Citibank documentation also refers to its role in handling foreign exchange conversions for unsponsored ADRs, which would apply to a program like TCEHY's.¹⁴

• Trading Characteristics: Despite being an OTC security, TCEHY ADRs exhibit significant trading volume and represent a substantial market capitalization, reflecting Tencent's status as one of the world's largest technology companies.²⁰

• SEC Filings: As an issuer of an unsponsored OTC ADR, Tencent Holdings itself does not make direct SEC filings (like Form 20-F) specifically for the TCEHY ADR program. Information available to U.S. investors is primarily derived from Tencent's filings with the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (its primary listing venue) and its public announcements. Any SEC filings associated with the TCEHY ticker are typically from large shareholders disclosing their ownership stakes (e.g., Schedule 13G/A filings) rather than from Tencent Holdings directly.³⁰

Tencent's TCEHY ADR demonstrates that even large, globally significant companies can be accessed by U.S. investors via unsponsored OTC mechanisms if there is sufficient investor demand. Tencent is a colossal technology firm with a primary listing in Hong Kong.²⁰ The existence of its actively traded TCEHY ADR on the U.S. OTC market ²¹, despite the program being unsponsored ¹⁴, clearly indicates strong and persistent U.S. investor interest. This situation highlights the adaptability of the ADR market in providing access even without formal company sponsorship for higher-level exchange listings. However, this route comes with trade-offs for investors, primarily in terms of relying more heavily on home market disclosures and facing the typical characteristics of an unsponsored ADR, such as the involvement of multiple depositaries and the absence of direct SEC financial reporting from the company tailored for the ADR program.

The presence of multiple depositaries for an unsponsored ADR like TCEHY ²¹ can lead to potential variations or competition in the services offered, such as fee structures or the efficiency of dividend processing, even though the underlying security represented by all such ADRs is the same (Tencent ordinary shares). In an unsponsored program, different depositary banks can independently issue ADRs based on the same underlying foreign shares.¹ While all these ADRs represent an ownership interest in Tencent stock, the specific terms and conditions related to fees or service levels might vary slightly from one depositary to another. Investors typically acquire these ADRs through their brokers, who may have established relationships or preferred channels with specific depositaries. This underscores the fact that, in the context of an unsponsored ADR, the "issuer" of the ADR certificate is the depositary bank, not Tencent Holdings directly.

Brief Mention: Tencent Music Entertainment Group (TME)#

As a point of contrast within the broader Tencent ecosystem, Tencent Music Entertainment Group (TME), a subsidiary of Tencent Holdings, has taken a different approach to accessing U.S. markets.

• TME's ADRs trade on the NYSE under the ticker symbol TME.³¹ This listing on a major U.S. exchange implies that it is a sponsored Level II or Level III ADR program, requiring higher levels of SEC compliance.

• The ADR ratio for TME is such that one ordinary share is represented by 0.5 Depositary Receipts (meaning it takes two ADRs to represent one ordinary share, or alternatively, one DR unit represents two ordinary shares).³¹

• BNY Mellon serves as the depositary bank for TME's ADR program.³¹

• Tencent Holdings Ltd. is a major shareholder in Tencent Music Entertainment Group.³²

The contrasting ADR strategies employed by Tencent Holdings (TCEHY - unsponsored, OTC-traded) and its subsidiary Tencent Music (TME - sponsored, NYSE-listed) highlight that ADR choices are highly company-specific strategic decisions. These decisions are influenced by a variety of factors, including the company's specific capital needs at the time of considering a U.S. listing, its investor relations objectives, its independent corporate structure, and its desired level of engagement with the U.S. market. Even within the same corporate conglomerate, different entities may opt for vastly different ADR paths based on their unique circumstances and strategic goals. For instance, TME likely pursued a sponsored NYSE-listed ADR, potentially involving an IPO ³¹, to raise capital independently, establish its own distinct investor base, and achieve higher visibility in the U.S. market as a standalone online music entertainment entity. This contrasts with its parent company, Tencent Holdings, which, already possessing massive global recognition, utilizes a less formal unsponsored ADR mechanism for U.S. investor access.

6. Strategic Considerations for ADR Investors#

Due Diligence and Research in the ADR Space#

Investing in ADRs requires a comprehensive due diligence process that extends beyond typical stock analysis. Investors should thoroughly research not only the underlying foreign company and its financial health but also its home market conditions and the specifics of the ADR program itself.⁴

For Level I or unsponsored ADRs, which trade on the OTC market, detailed information may be less readily available, may not be provided in English, or may not conform to U.S. GAAP or IFRS accounting standards.⁷ In such cases, the foreign company's own website and its regulatory filings on its home market stock exchange become primary sources of information.

For Level II and Level III ADRs, which are listed on major U.S. exchanges, the SEC's EDGAR database provides access to valuable information, including the company's Form 20-F annual reports and Form 6-K submissions for material news.² These documents offer a degree of standardized disclosure.

Regardless of the ADR level, a critical aspect of due diligence is understanding the political, economic, and regulatory risks inherent in the foreign company's country of domicile.⁴ These country-specific factors can significantly impact the company's operations and the value of its ADRs.

Effective ADR investing necessitates a bifocal due diligence approach. This means investors must analyze the company's business fundamentals (as they would for any equity investment) and concurrently understand the nuances and specific risks associated with the ADR structure itself, as well as the broader conditions of the foreign jurisdiction. Simply reviewing the financial statements in a Form 20-F, for example, is insufficient. Investors must also consider factors such as the ADR level (which implies the quality and depth of available information), whether the program is sponsored (indicating the degree of company commitment), the fee structure imposed by the depositary bank ¹³, the impact of the ADR ratio on valuation metrics ⁹, the pervasive influence of currency risk ⁴, and the overarching political and regulatory climate of the company's home country.⁴ This dual focus is essential for identifying and mitigating risks that are unique to ADR investments.

Understanding the ADR Ratio and its Impact on Valuation#

The ADR ratio, which defines how many ordinary shares of the foreign company are represented by a single ADR, is a critical piece of information for any ADR investor.¹ This ratio is fundamental for accurately comparing the price of the ADR trading in the U.S. market to the price of the underlying ordinary shares trading in the company's home market.

Moreover, the ADR ratio directly affects the calculation of per-ADR dividend amounts and earnings figures. If an ADR represents, for example, five ordinary shares, then the dividend paid per ADR will be five times the dividend paid per ordinary share (before any fees or taxes are applied). Similarly, earnings per ADR will be five times the earnings per ordinary share. It's also important to note that ADR ratios are not always static; they can be changed by the depositary bank in consultation with the company, as was the case with Alibaba's BABA ADRs.¹¹

Misunderstanding or entirely ignoring the ADR ratio can lead to significant errors in investment valuation and decision-making. An investor might incorrectly perceive an ADR as being "cheaper" or "more expensive" than it truly is relative to its underlying shares or when comparing it to peer companies if the ratio is not factored into the analysis. For instance, if an investor compares the nominal price of an ADR to the nominal price of its corresponding ordinary share without adjusting for the ADR ratio ⁹, they will obtain a distorted view of its relative value. If an ADR for Company X trades at $50 and has a 5:1 ratio (meaning 1 ADR represents 5 ordinary shares), the equivalent price per ordinary share via the ADR is $10. If the ordinary shares of Company X trade in their home market at a price equivalent to $10, then the ADR and ordinary shares are priced consistently. However, without knowing and applying the 5:1 ratio, a direct comparison of the $50 ADR price to the $10 ordinary share price would be meaningless and misleading. This principle also applies with equal importance to the calculation of dividend yields and price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios on a per-ADR basis.

7. Conclusion: The Evolving Role of ADRs in Global Portfolios#

American Depositary Receipts have long served as a vital and effective tool for U.S. investors seeking to access international equities and diversify their portfolios beyond domestic markets. They simplify cross-border investing by overcoming many of the operational, currency, and regulatory complexities that would otherwise confront individual investors.

The ADR market is not static; it is an evolving ecosystem influenced by the ongoing globalization of financial markets, shifts in international regulatory landscapes, and the strategic decisions of foreign companies. Recent developments, such as the implementation of the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (HFCAA) in the U.S., have introduced new dynamics, particularly for Chinese ADRs, by imposing stricter audit inspection requirements.¹⁷ Such regulatory changes can significantly alter the landscape, compelling some companies to enhance their compliance measures or, in some instances, to delist from U.S. exchanges, as seen with Didi Global.¹⁶ Concurrently, persistent investor demand for international exposure continues to drive innovation and maintain the relevance of the ADR mechanism. The resolution allowing the PCAOB to conduct inspections of Chinese audit firms is an example of how the market and regulatory bodies can adapt to new challenges.¹⁷

For investors, navigating the complexities and opportunities of the ADR market requires informed decision-making. This involves a thorough understanding of the underlying foreign company, the economic and political environment of its home country, the specific structure and level of the ADR program, associated fees, tax implications, and currency risks.

Despite the inherent challenges and evolving complexities, ADRs will likely remain a key component of U.S. investors' international diversification strategies, especially for gaining exposure to emerging markets. The unparalleled ease of access to a wide array of foreign stocks that ADRs offer is a compelling advantage for many U.S. investors.² While significant events like the Didi delisting ¹⁶ or broader geopolitical tensions may cause temporary shifts in market sentiment or lead to specific delistings, the fundamental need for global portfolio diversification endures. It is probable that investors will become increasingly discerning, paying even closer attention to the home country risks and the specific structural details of individual ADRs. However, the ADR instrument itself is too valuable and too deeply embedded in the U.S. investment landscape to be abandoned. The market will continue to adapt, potentially with new ADR structures, enhanced disclosure norms, or different regional focuses evolving over time to meet the needs of both global companies and U.S. investors.

Works cited#

1. American depositary receipt - Wikipedia, accessed June 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_depositary_receipt

2. Learn about trading American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) and international stock types, accessed June 3, 2025, https://international.schwab.com/investment-products/adrs-otc-stocks

3. What are ADRs and GDRs? | Sumlad Ireland, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.sumlad.com/what-are-adrs-and-gdrs-ireland/

4. What Is ADR in Stock Market: Meaning, Types & Advantages | 5paisa, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.5paisa.com/stock-market-guide/stock-share-market/what-is-american-depositary-receipts-adr

5. How Depository Banks Benefit From Issuing ADRs - Investopedia, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/06/adrdepositorybank.asp

6. What Are ADRs? | Chase, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.chase.com/personal/investments/learning-and-insights/article/what-are-adrs

7. Sponsored ADRs: What They are, How They Work - Investopedia, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sponsoredadr.asp

8. Level I vs. Level II vs. Level III ADRs: What's the Difference?, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/041015/what-are-differences-between-levels-i-ii-and-iii-american-depository-receipts-adrs.asp

9. Investor Bulletin: American Depositary Receipts - SEC.gov, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/investor/alerts/adr-bulletin.pdf

10. ADR Conversions | Interactive Brokers LLC, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.interactivebrokers.com/en/trading/adr-conversions.php

11. Citi's Depositary Receipt Services, accessed June 3, 2025, https://citiadr.factsetdigitalsolutions.com/stocks/profile.idms?cusip=01609W102

12. DR Universe - J.P. Morgan's adr.com | The premier site for the global investor, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.adr.com/dr/drdirectory/drUniverse

13. Investing in ADRs, Foreign Ordinaries, & Canadian Stocks | Charles Schwab, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/stocks/understand-stocks/adrs-foreign-ordinaries-canadian-stocks

14. PROCEEDS FROM SALE OF RIGHTS - Citi DR, accessed June 3, 2025, https://depositaryreceipts.citi.com/adr/guides/viewDocument.aspx?secid=TCEHY&divid=017&annid=2&type=P

15. March 7, 2025 - BNY Mellon's Depositary Receipts', accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.adrbny.com/content/dam/adr/documents/corporate-actions-dr/files/AD2000124.pdf

16. DiDi Provides Notification to Delist its ADSs from NYSE - DiDi Global, accessed June 3, 2025, https://ir.didiglobal.com/news-and-events/news/news-details/2022/DiDi-Provides-Notification-to-Delist-its-ADSs-from-NYSE/default.aspx

17. Chinese Companies Listed on Major U.S. Stock Exchanges, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/Chinese_Companies_Listed_on_US_Stock_Exchanges_01_2023.pdf

18. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd - ADR (BABA) Price & News - Google ..., accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.google.com/finance/quote/BABA:NYSE

19. DIDIY - DiDi Global Inc. | Overview - OTC Markets, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/DIDIY

20. Tencent Holdings Ltd ADR Share Price | OTC: TCEHY Stock ..., accessed June 3, 2025, https://uk.investing.com/equities/tencent-holdings-pk

21. The premier site for the global investor - J.P. Morgan's adr.com, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.adr.com/drprofile/88032Q109

22. Alibaba Group Holding Limited American Depositary Shares each representing eight Ordinary share (BABA) SEC Filings | Nasdaq, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/baba/sec-filings

23. DiDi Global Inc. American Depositary Shares (each four ... - Nasdaq, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/didiy

24. 2022 - SEC.gov, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1577552/000110465922082622/baba-20220331x20f.htm

25. Company Books Close / Open Notices - Citi's Depositary Receipt Services, accessed June 3, 2025, https://depositaryreceiptsuat.citi.com/adr/guides/pgm_dispabook.aspx?pageId=15&subpageID=111&cusip=23292E108

26. Company Capital Raisings - Citi's Depositary Receipt Services, accessed June 3, 2025, https://depositaryreceipts.citi.com/adr/guides/pgm_d.aspx?pageId=15&subpageid=105&cusip=23292E108&typeDisplay=C

27. Alibaba Group Holdings Ltd ADR Share Price | NYSE: BABA Stock - Investing.com UK, accessed June 3, 2025, https://uk.investing.com/equities/alibaba

28. DiDi Announces Pricing of Initial Public Offering, accessed June 3, 2025, https://ir.didiglobal.com/news-and-events/news/news-details/2021/DiDi-Announces-Pricing-of-Initial-Public-Offering/default.aspx

29. Tencent Holdings Ltd. ADR (TCEHY) Stock Price, Quote, News & History | Nasdaq, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/tcehy

30. Tencent Holdings Ltd. ADR (TCEHY) SEC Filings - Nasdaq, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/tcehy/sec-filings

31. Tencent Music Entertainment Group (TME) Stock Price Quote, accessed June 3, 2025, https://cbonds.com/stocks/US88034P1093/

32. Tencent Music Entertainment Group ADR (NYSE:TME) Share Price - Interactive Investor, accessed June 3, 2025, https://www.ii.co.uk/shares/tencent-music-entertainment-group-adr/NYSE:TME